Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02079945DOJ Data Set 10Other

EFTA02079945

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-02079945
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: From: Mika Tanaka Nakano Sent Wed 4/22/2015 2:36:28 PM Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Oh, no... I hope they should have told me so, when I sent the word files to you a few days ago, and before I get all the letters and seals ready... As you can read the direction from the Foreign Ministry, it says very clearly that if there are more than two applicants, you can make all application together. I can't get the seals until the week of May 4, since Chiaki will be out of office. Please be patient and wait for the letters from Japan for next few weeks. Mika 2015/04/2223:22, 0 : Mika, I completely understand but I have been advised by our Visa Application agency who specializes in Japanese visas that Japan is quite strict and the rejection rate is high...they strongly encourage us to have a letter for each individual traveling...Would it be possible to please work up the documents in Karyna and names as well? Sorry for any inconvenience! On Apr 22, 2015, at 1:09 AM, Mika Tanaka Nakano wrote: We need to put information of one representative applicant on the letters. You can find some the direction about how to fill out the letters on the files, that I downloaded from the Foreign Ministry. As you can see on the PDF letters, I did make sure just in case putting one sentence that "you can refer the information of additional applicants on the list of applicants". Thanks! Mika EFTA_R1_00661452 EFTA02079945 2015/04/22 2:44, Mika, I assume you are sending a Letter of Guarantee and Letter For REason of Invitation for and Karyna as well (you just didn't attach to the emiiil orrect? On Apr 21, 2015, at 1:58 AM, Mika Tanaka Nakano isamings> wrote: <Copies of documents provided from Japan_Japanese visa for Russians Apr 2015.pdf> EFTA_R1_00881453 EFTA02079946

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.