EFTA02146797

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 10

Reference

efta-02146797

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

To: Kelleher, Caitl* From: Lesley Groff Sent Tue 3/12/2013 1:40:32 PM Subject: Re: Monday Caitlin, Jeffrey will be in NY March 19th...any chance the Gov. could do dinner this night? (he flies in this date) On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Kelleher, Caitlin wrote: Thanks much Caitlin Kelleher Office of Governor Bill Richardson <image001.jpg><image002 .j pg> From: Lesley Groff [mailt Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:08 AM To: Kelleher, Caitlin Subject Re: Monday Hello Caitlin! Let me double check JE's calendar...will get back to you. On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:13 AM, Kelleher, Caitlin wrote: Ili Leslie!! Is Jeffrey in NY on Monday? Can he do dinner if so? Let me know, please. Thanks, Caitlin Kelleher Office of Governor Bill Richardson <image001.jpg><Image002.jpg> EFTA_R1_00805376 EFTA02146797 No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2240 / Virus Database: 2641/5664 - Release Date: 03/11/13 EFTA_R1_00805377 EFTA02146798

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.avg.com

Phone2146797

Phone2146798

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown