Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02379503DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02379503

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02379503
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Steven Sinofsky •‘ > Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 6:00 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: next ok Sent from Windows Mail on Surface RT http://blog.learningbyshipping.com From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 10:59 AM To: Steven Sinofsky the board meeting on cues will be very difficult for steve. you are in a good position, relax. On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Steven Sinofsky > wrote: So what should I do about PR stuff once we sign. While one school of thought says they won't do anything that is highly unlikely since they will get calls and have to say something. They will officially no comment but then while on the phone set a tone for the story as best they can. Two things occur to me: Steve is a guy that thinks he can use the press but gets confused. He is currently driving a big reorg and doing most of that through the press first--many senior people know less than they are telling the NY Times and Bloomberg (a good indication of talking to the press is that these stories were almost the same) http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-03/microsoft-s-ballmer-said-to-plan-broad-restructuring.html and http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/microsoft-weighs-restructuring/ * Brad can be influenced to at least speak to PR and tell them how to handle. Right now for example, this whole NSA PRISM thing makes me want to go be a whistleblower since everyone is being less than forthright. It seems like Jay could talk to brad and politely / indirectly remind him that we know MS went to the press and how they did back in November. And that two can do this, I just didn't last time -- would be awful if folks found out steve organizes to prevent succession planning, for example. Steve has a lot going on. He is getting board approval for the reorg which is really all driven by financial reporting stuff -- he really wants to obscure reporting (BING, Phone, XBOX) Or one could be generous and say he wants to manage the business differently and thinks that people follow the money when they build products (odd). Wants to buy a phone company too. Are we sure people like Apple will read the agreement and not worry? Hard to work for someone if there is a perception you can't say "things" about competitors...just jittery about that. SORRY! EFTA_R1_01392999 EFTA02379503 Sent from Windows Mail on Surface RT http://blog.learningbyshipping.com The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01393000 EFTA02379504

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2379503
Phone2379504
URLhttp://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/microsoft-weighs-restructuring
URLhttp://blog.learningbyshipping.com
URLhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-03/microsoft-s-ballmer-said-to-plan-broad-restructuring.html

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.