Case File
efta-02384438DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02384438
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02384438
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
on behalf of Seth Lloyd
Sent:
Monday, July 6, 2015 7:59 AM
To:
Jeffrey E.
Subject:
Re:
Dear Jeffrey,
My apologies for not resp=nding sooner. I took an email vacation for a week plus which =urned out to be a
mistake because I fell irrevocably behin=.
That was a very fun conversation with Noam in C=mbridge: he is an amazing thinker (if a tad inflexible at times).
Your question about entropy is an important one. Th= second law of thermodynamics tells us that
systems go to states=of high entropy where events are random and uncorrelated, so that thermal<=div>
fluctuations appear to be statistically independent. Howev=r, if you
look under the hood of the second law, you find that w=at is really going on is that the dynamics that leads you to thi=
high entropy state is actually generating huge amounts of correlations
between the different parts of the system.
In f=ct, the apparently random and independent
fluctuations of the pa=ts reflect large correlations with the other parts of the system. B=t these
correlations are effectively smeared out over the whole =ystem: to reveal the fact that they are not truly independent,
o=e would have to make measurements on all the parts together, and
For example, even though the apparent high entrop= of a gas of molecules reflects all the correlations that are
ge=erated by the collisions of molecules over time, if one looks at=just two molecules in the gas, their motions will be
statistically indepen=ent to a high degree of accuracy.
adiv>
On your second question, quantum superposition is indeed closely =nalogous to a chord in music: the strangeness and
power of quant=m superposition arises out of the interference between the diffe=ent waves in the superposition.
A classical computer can o=ly register one set of logical values for its
bits at any given =ime. So a classical computation is like plain chant: a <=div>
single sequence of tones without interference. By co=trast, a quantum computation
is like a symphony: its power comes=from the rich sequence of quantum 'chords.'
T=ere is a difference, however. The more waves that participate in a =uantum
superposition, the smaller the amplitude of each wave: th= sum of the
square of the amplitudes is always 1. =C2 So unlike music, where the volume
can change, the total 'vo=ume' of a quantum chord is always the same not matter how ma=y tones are added.
Hope these answ=rs help.
You wrote earlier about l=fe being a process of functors acting on functors. Amen!
= am working on trying to prove that sets of ordinary differential equation= of the kind that underlie chemical dynamics
will spontaneously =ive rise to such
a functorial dynamics. Not so easy=...
EFTA_R1_01402199
EFTA02384438
Hoping you are well. l=am currently at the physics center in Benasque, in the high Pyre=ees, where physics is done
primarily on long hikes in the mountains.
=div>Very nice.
Hoping our paths cross soon,
=div>Seth
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:42 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]=ta» wrote:
s=th, lye been having many email exchanges with noam. great fun.=C2 I am stumped. on the concept of a
large probabitli=y space? entropy. . ? if the space is =arge enough , how does one know if there is independent
events. . as=the information would take so much time to travel between each and or obse=ver. ? quesiton 2. in
music , one has = dominant tone and then harmonics. . a chord is a combination =f those . lets say 1st third and fifth? .
is that =quivalent to a superpostion at the quantum level? your ear per=orms a transform to tease out each tone afther
the fact. ?
=AO please note
The information contained in this commu=ication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
cons=itute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addre=see. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copyi=g of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
a=d may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, pl=ase notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], a=d
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all a=tachments. copyright -all rights reserved
2
EFTA_R1_01402200
EFTA02384439
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.