Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02391957DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02391957

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02391957
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Daniel Sabba To: [email protected] <'eevacation mail.com> c: V h ani n < er w: =1 etro ras ut to un .y ys as ro•e obbles Oil Producer Sent Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:22:42 AM Classification: Public We have been discussing this potential event for some time now... It should be positive to CDS position. Great trade Jeffrey. From: Daniel Sabba (DEUTSCHE BANK SECURI) [mailto Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 05:19 AM Subject: (BN) Petrobras Cut to Junk by Moody's as Probe Hobbles Oil Producer Sent from Bloomberg Professional for iPhone This has been prepared solely for informational purposes. It is not an offer, recommendation or so licitation to buy or sell, nor is it an official confirmation of terms. It is based on information gener ally available to the public from sources believed to be reliable. No representation is made that it i s accurate or complete or that any returns indicated will be achieved. Changes to assumptions ma y have a material impact on any returns detailed. Past performance is not indicative of future retur ns. Price and availability are subject to change without notice. Additional information is available upon request. Petrobras Cut to Junk by Moody's as Probe Hobbles Oil Producer 2015-02-25 02:12:47.192 GMT By Filipe Pacheco and Sabrina Valle (Bloomberg) -- Petroleo Brasileiro SA's descent into junk- bond status may be far from over. Moody's Investors Service kept a negative outlook on the state-controlled oil producer's rating after cutting it to Ba2, two levels below investment grade, on Tuesday. The two-step downgrade marks the second cut by Moody's in less than a month for the company, which is embroiled in a widening graft probe. Petrobras's bonds and stock have plunged since November, when police arrested more than 20 people as part of an investigation into whether company executives demanded bribes from builders in exchange for contracts. Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poor's rate the company at their lowest investment EFTA_R1_01418464 EFTA02391957 grades, and internal deliberations on corruption-related writedowns have led to delays in releasing third-quarter results. "The cut by two notches can be seen as surprising," Carlos Gribel, the head of fixed income at Andbanc Brokerage LLC, said by telephone from Miami. "The main concern now will be another cut to junk by Fitch or S&P, which could lead the company's bonds to be sold by many institutional investors." The probe prompted Chief Executive Officer Maria das Graces Foster to step down earlier this month, after she failed to broker a consensus on the size of the writedowns. Rio de Janeiro-based Petrobras said in a regulatory filing on Tuesday that it has no bond covenants that would be triggered by a downgrade to junk. Bond Losses The oil producer, which has been all but shut off from debt markets due to the probe, has about $52 billion in bonds. Petrobras's $3.5 billion of notes due in 2023 have tumbled 10 percent since November, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Yields on the debt have surged 1.6 percentage points in that span to 7 percent. The company's shares have lost 28 percent during the span. The downgrade by Moody's "reflects increasing concern about corruption investigations and liquidity pressures," Nymia de Almeida, an analyst at the rating company, said in a statement on Tuesday. The company will be challenged to make a meaningful reduction in its "very high debt burden" over the next several years, she said. Petrobras bonds were already trading closer to junk than to investment grade. As of yesterday, yields on the bonds due in 2021 were at 7.31 percent, closer to the average 8 percent yield of companies in the junk-grade Ba category than to the 5.2 percent average for those in the higher Baa bucket. The rating cut is the latest blow to Petrobras, which became the biggest bond issuer in emerging markets as it sought financing to develop the largest offshore crude discovery in the Western Hemisphere since 1976. Rousseff Popularity After years of missing output goals and selling imported gasoline at a discount as part of government policies to tame inflation, Petrobras is now worth just $45.1 billion. At its peak in 2009, the company's market capitalization reached $310 billion, making it the world's fifth-largest company. EFTA_R1_01418465 EFTA02391958 Petrobras was rated as high as A2 at Moody's between 2005 and 2009, the sixth-highest investment grade. In 2011, Moody's rated the company three levels higher than the Brazilian government. The scandal has added to the woes of President Dilma Rousseff, who served as chairman of Petrobras between 2003 and 2010, the period during which the alleged payoffs occurred. "Petrobras was already living the perfect storm," Adriano Pires, the head of Rio de Janeiro-based energy and infrastructure consulting firm CBIE, said by telephone from Rio de Janeiro. "Now it is even worse." For Related News and Information: Petrobras Said to Negotiate $31 Million Accord to Retain PwC Petrobras $4 Billion Bond Wipeout Is Just Prelude: Brazil Credit Petrobras, $262 Billion Poorer, Exposes Busted Brazil Dream Top Stories: TOP<GO> Top Latin American News: TOPL <GO> --With assistance from Julia Leite in New York. To contact the reporters on this sto Filipe Pacheco in Sao Paulo at Sabrina Valle in Rio de Janeiro at To contact the editors res nsible for this story: Brendan Walsh at or Lester Pimentel, Bradley Keoun This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this communication in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this communication. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this communication is strictly forbidden. Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice, and the information contained in this communication should not be regarded as such. EFTA_R1_01418466 EFTA02391959

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2391957
Phone2391958
Phone2391959
SWIFT/BICDEUTSCHE

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Letter to Judge Mark Filip requesting cessation of federal prosecution, signed by Kenneth Starr and others

Letter to Judge Mark Filip requesting cessation of federal prosecution, signed by Kenneth Starr and others The passage mentions high‑profile legal figures (Judge Mark Filip, former special prosecutor Kenneth Starr, U.S. Attorney Acosta) asking to end federal involvement in an unspecified case. It lacks concrete details about the underlying matter, transactions, dates, or wrongdoing, offering only a generic claim of federal overreach. While the involvement of notable officials gives some investigative value, the absence of specifics limits actionable follow‑up. Key insights: Request to halt federal prosecution and defer to state jurisdiction; Signed by Kenneth Starr, former independent counsel; Addressed to Judge Mark Filip, a federal judge

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
House OversightUnknown

Allegations of Prosecutorial Impropriety in Jeffrey Epstein Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Allegations of Prosecutorial Impropriety in Jeffrey Epstein Deferred Prosecution Agreement The passage suggests possible misconduct by federal prosecutors in negotiating Epstein's deferred prosecution, citing contradictions in statements and a potential conflict with state jurisdiction. It names a high‑level official (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip) and references the USAO, offering a concrete lead for further inquiry, but lacks specific financial details or new revelations, placing it in the moderate‑lead range. Key insights: Claims federal prosecutors pressured for a longer sentence than the state desired.; Alleges a false statement by attorney J. Sloman about the SDFL's willingness to defer incarceration.; Mentions a deferred prosecution agreement that was later altered to 18 months plus house arrest.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Deferred Prosecution Irregularities in Jeffrey Epstein Case

Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct and Deferred Prosecution Irregularities in Jeffrey Epstein Case The passage suggests possible misconduct by federal prosecutors in negotiating a deferred prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein, citing alleged false testimony, lack of required communications, and questionable legal strategy. It names specific individuals (Mark Filip, Jeffrey Herman) and hints at irregularities that could merit further investigation into prosecutorial decisions and potential conflicts of interest. Key insights: Testimony claims no interstate communications meeting §2422(b) occurred.; Women allegedly lied about ages to gain access, contradicting claims of victim coercion.; Deferred prosecution agreement described as irregular and beyond typical prosecutorial scope.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Kavanaugh‑Era DOJ Letter from Kenneth Starr’s Firm Requests Review of Federal Prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

The fax shows senior former counsel (Kenneth Starr) and a DOJ Deputy Attorney General (Mark Filip) being asked to intervene in a federal case against Jeffrey Epstein, citing political pressure tied to Letter signed by Kenneth W. Starr (former counsel) on behalf of Epstein’s defense. Requests Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip to review a proposed federal prosecution. Alleges that the USAO in Miami

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: draft letter to DAG I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Airs: Assistant LAS Auorney 99N.& eth Street Aftam: Ft 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FEDERAL EXPRESS June 2, 2008 Honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein is a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors. In July 2006, the matter was presented to AUSA A. Marie Villafana of our West Palm Beach b

14p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.