Case File
efta-02394538DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02394538
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02394538
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Joichi Ito
Sent:
Friday, April 29, 2016 2:08 AM
To:
Jeffrey Epstein
Subject:
Antidisciplinary Science Fellows Proposal
Hi Jeffrey.
Here's a rough proposal for a approximately $10M plan =or the science fellows. Let me know if this might work for the
=oundation you were talking about.
- Joi
Proposal: Antidisciplinary Science Fellows =rogram MIT Media =ab April =016
The MIT Media Lab seeks support for a fellowship =rogram in Antidisciplinary Science. The Lab is a leader in this area,
=hich promises to fundamentally rethink research and practice around =cientific inquiry. We seek $12 million to fund
and operate the first =hree years of this fellowship program.
Today, we face a crisis in science. Academic =cience is not leading to breakthrough innovations, and the disciplinary
=tructures of the academy are largely to blame. Certain types of =esearch are recognized and rewarded, and become
defined as disciplines. =s this happens, people begin talking only to a very small peer group, =ften by publishing in a
small number of very specific journals. =eanwhile, we believe the most important scientific questions today =eside in the
spaces between disciplines.
In contrast to interdisciplinary work where people =rom different disciplines work together, the Media Lab is driven by
=/span>antidisciplinary work. =nbsp;An antidisciplinary project isn't a sum of many =isciplines but something entirely
new—the word defies easy =efinition. But what it means to the Media Lab is someone or something =hat doesn't fit
within a traditional academic discipline—a =ield of study with its own particular words, frameworks, and methods. =ost
academics are judged by how many times they have published in =restigious, peer-reviewed journals. This system often
leads researchers =o align their work to the dictates of peer review rather than risking =he potential repercussions of an
unconventional approach. Indeed, the =urrent peer review system causes hyper-specialization where people in =ifferent
fields have a very difficult time collaborating—or =ven communicating—with people in other fields.
When Joi thinks about the "space" =he Lab has created, he likes to imagine a huge piece of paper that =epresents "all
science." The disciplines, such as =E2 chemistry," "genetics" or "design=E2 are small black dots on this paper. The
massive amounts of =hite space between the dots represent antidisciplinary space. Many =eople would like to play in
this white space, but there is very little =unding available, and it's even harder to get a tenured =osition without some
sort of disciplinary anchor in one of the black =ots.
Additionally, it appears increasingly difficult to =ackle many of the interesting problems—as well as the "wi=ked
problems"—through a traditional disciplinary =pproach. Unraveling the complexities of the human body is the perfect
=xample. Our best chance for rapid breakthroughs should come through a =ollaborative "One Science." But instead, we
seem unable =o move beyond "many sciences"—a complex mosaic =f so many different disciplines that often we don't
recognize =hen we are looking at the same problem because our language is so =ifferent and our microscopes are set so
differently.
EFTA_R1_01423983
EFTA02394538
So how do we find talent in as yet unnamed =ields? We hypothesize that the regular academic processes of hiring and
=eer review will not find these people. And current programs to find =xceptional individuals are either too organized or
not organized =nough. There is a limit to how much the search for geniuses can and =hould be centrally planned and
organized, as the best people tend to =ave their discussions outside of institutions. Events like ='Reilly's FOO Camp are a
wonderful example of =uccessful models of unstructured ways of discovering and engaging such =alent. However, we
are interested in exploring a different way that =etter integrates with the academic research structure. Therefore the
=edia Lab is developing a new prize and fellowship program focused on =inding extraordinary minds who are working
beyond disciplinary =ounds.
The Antidisciplinary Science Fellowship Program =roposes to locate remarkable people working in antidisciplinary white
=paces by offering prizes to individuals from inside and outside =cademia, giving them access to the resources of the
Media Lab and each =ther, and bringing them to the attention of the world. We will work =ith a group of nominators and
we will also utilize a novel Web-based =omination crowdsourcing platform, also offering prizes to people who =dentify
such exceptional talents. A small, distinguished selection =ommittee will then review nominees and award prizes of
$100,000 each to = maximum of ten individuals each year. Each winner will select up to =ive other individuals working
on a related topic, forming an =nvestigational cluster. Team members in each cluster will receive a =rize of $10,000. All
Fellows and team members will stay in their =urrent locations, but will be brought together at an annual Fellows =vent
at the Media Lab, and will also communicate regularly over the =ourse of a year.
Through this project the MIT Media Lab aims to =rigger a shift in the nature of scientific inquiry and nurture entire =ew
areas of discovery that could bring about beneficial impacts to =umanity. We believe the Lab can bring the right balance
of =nstitutional rigor and free-form creativity to this search and =election process. The Media Lab is a top research and
teaching program =ithin one of the world's best universities, but at the same =ime is also unique within MIT. And we
have worked for 30 years to =nsure that our students and faculty have the freedom to explore the =ildest and most
compelling of ideas.
Budget =over 3 years)
Staff: =nbsp;
&n=sp;
&nbs=;
=nbsp;
&n=sp;
$1,118,164
Travel: =nbsp;
&n=sp;
&nbs=;
=nbsp;
&n=sp;
$490,000
Materials and Services: =nbsp;
&n=sp;
$210,000
Convenings: =nbsp;
&n=sp;
&nbs=;
=nbsp;
=/span>$1,725,000
Crowdsourcing system: =/span>$300,000
Prizes: = $4,950,000
Selection Committee Honoraria: =/span> =/span>$1,200,000
Overhead at 20%: =nbsp;
&n=sp;
&nbs=; =/span> =/span>$1,998,633
Total: =nbsp;
&n=sp;
&nbs=;
=nbsp;
&n=sp;
$11,991,797
2
EFTA_R1_01423984
EFTA02394539
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
2394538Phone
2394539Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02208486
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Joi Ito
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01966900
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02059047
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02115167
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
2p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.