Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02410027DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02410027

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02410027
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: •• rieevacationggmailcom] From Sent Mon 11/22/2010 6:03:19 PM Subject: RE: Gov. Richardson I will forward info to the Gov... From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 1:02 PM To: Lesley Groff Subject: Re: Gov. Richardson Barry Krischer who was the elected State Attorney during Jeffrey's case. He was actively involved in the case and is willing to talk His cell phone # is On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:57 PM, wrote: Leslie — The Governor is wondering the name of the attorney who prosecuted Jeffrey. Thanks—Janis The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA_R1_01470560 EFTA02410027

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeFeb 21, 2019

Read the judge's ruling

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's

33p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution agreement and alleged high‑level connections revealed in multiple Palm Beach filings

The passage aggregates numerous contemporaneous reports about a secret non‑prosecution agreement that allowed billionaire Jeffrey Epstein to avoid federal charges, mentions specific federal actors (U. Sealed non‑prosecution agreement between Epstein and U.S. Attorney's Office (2007‑2008) prevented fe Agreement granted immunity to co‑conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, Nadia Marc

25p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

SUSPECTED MOTIVE BEHIND GOVERNMENT AND POLICE SOURCES INVOLVED

SUSPECTED MOTIVE BEHIND GOVERNMENT AND POLICE SOURCES INVOLVED IN CONSPIRED COVER UP OF FAMIL L MOLESTATION OF TARGETED VICTIM TH H R BY THE BROTHER FAMILY MEMBER ANTHEThra GATION AND CON- SPIRED ATTACK Or rit /WILY I O DEMORALISE THE DAUGHTER, SISTER AND DISCREDIT HER CREDITABILITY AND TARGETING HER WITH A SEXUAL ABUSE RING CONNECTED TO GOVERNMENT SOURCES AND EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL SUSPECTED MOTIVE OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INVOLVEMENT : COMMENCEMENT - KADINA • JOHN OLSEN - MAYOR OF KADINA - LIBERAL GOVERNMENT MEMBER • ROWAN RAMSAY - FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MEMBER - KADINA AND PORT PIRIE The mother, i= suspected of being sexually active in the community of Kadina as a teenager invo ving sexual interaction with the government officials involved in Kadina John Olsen, Kadina and Rowan Ramsay, Kadina / Port Pine and the overnment officials knowledge of this sexual activity and manipulated by the mother to assist in the family secret cover up under the act of the motive of th

70p
Dept. of JusticeFeb 21, 2019

Epstein

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's

33p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5119122. 3152

5119122. 3152 PM iV; L c ol g or yeR - cioveizN. riccsr nc — C I Ka • inceNT eaDA)E Jeffrey Epstein - Widpedla FRM CC- AOST Epstein a massage" She claims she was taken to his mansion, , Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.a9--6I A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer. -2.1 These and several similar lawsuits were dismis,sed.ing All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.fml Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.11T-4 aiCE PS/6 — MAXWELL - SC'cUAL i\ k.)3C RINC44 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) C)(4 R L tql3Q•sC at egejt-ttiV POS I C. t\CS A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe i ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims', Rig

70p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01661603

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.