EFTA02412728

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 11

Reference

efta-02412728

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

To: Jeffrey Epsteinfleevacation©gmail.com] From: David Ross Sent: Thur 4/16/2009 10:34:16 PM Subject: Re: Trying to figure some things out. Just did my second piece for Flyp on the new show at the New Museum (at flypmedia.com). Have to secure health insurance somehow, may need to sell my NYC apt, all in all a confusing and slightly depressing moment. Especially as i approach 60 on the 26th. Yikes. Spent the day with Brice Marden at the great Cezanne show in Philly (my next piece for FLYP). So feeling elated. Teaching at SVA tonight - senior seminar preparing these young artists for the real world that awaits them. How fucking ironic can you get! Let's talk this weekend. Thinking about you and your odd set up. Hope you are well. D. David A Ross mobile On Apr 16, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: > so -- -new? EFTA_R1_01474424 EFTA02412728

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01802398

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01693301

96p

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00025469

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00010819

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.