Case File
efta-02412752DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02412752
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02412752
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To:
Jeevacabon'eevacation
nuRomm
From:
Sent
on
Subject: Next steps?
Hi Jeffrey,
I'm starting to feel like a stalker! ... making contact with you is being
particularly difficult.
I'm a bit perplexed, as in our earlier discussions I really felt you "got" the
vision and importance of what I'm trying to do. It's unfortunate if you've been
put off by the critiques of folks like Schank and Minsky, whose AI ideas were
discredited decades ago! I'd be happy to debate AI specifics with either of
those guys (or anyone else), but first they'd have to be convinced to actually
take the time to understand what I'm proposing rather than making a snap judgment
based on shallow surface-level indicators and their (rather heavy)
prior biases. (I wish you could have been at the AGI-09 conference, where a
bunch of researchers were seriously discussing my project among others. Not that
everyone saw eye-to-eye with me about what is the best approach to take, but at
least there were real discussions on the issues relevant to making a design like
mine truly work.)
Membrane computing is certainly very cool, and I'm sure a lot of the other stuff
you're funding is also. But my project has a genuine chance of leading to a
breakthrough in the next 2-4 years, and a human-level AI in 7-10 years. I know
I'm a bit eccentric, but I'm not
**insane** ... I have a load of relevant knowledge and I deeply, sincerely
believe I'm onto something here.
Even if you think I have only a 5% chance of success, the payoff is so large, it
should surely be worth the investment!! (Yes, I understand you might have 100
guys pestering you with comparable projects that you also think have 5% chances
of success. But, do you really? I don't see many AI projects out there with
**any** realistic chance of leading to dramatic results in the near term. I see
plenty of cool ideas, but no other coherent artificial-mind design fleshed out in
nearly as much detail as my stuff)
Anyway, I'd appreciate the chance to talk again ... I can keep phoning at random
but it would be more effective if you would tell me a specific time to call (or
visit ;-).
Thanks!
Ben
Ben Goertzel, PhD
CEO, Novamente LLC and Biomind LLC
Director of Research, SIAI
Critical threshold: Being generally intelligent enough to be disappointed by
one's own lack of general intelligence
EFTA_R1_01474465
EFTA02412752
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
2412752Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02499157
2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02121328
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
Creating Intelligent Humanoid Robots
10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
Science Philanthropist, Jeffrey Epstein, Backs the First Free Thinking Robots
2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01756518
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02573952
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.