Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02413388DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02413388

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02413388
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: jeevacationtagmail.com[[email protected]] From: Mark Fisher Sent Fri 6/11/2010 2:00:52 PM I read some of the Internet news re recent legal actions, ie, Rodriguez and attempts to expand actions against you. if you are are at risk there are things you need to do for protection from a Jewish point of view. Remember, the hearts of kings (prosecutors government officials and lawyers) are in the hands of Hashem. There is no trial down here without a verdict upstairs. There are specific things you should do to engender protection from above and attempt to turn things in your favor besides relying on lawyers etc... who are only puppets in a vastly larger game. Call me to discuss. Mark Fisher EFTA_R1_01475894 EFTA02413388

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainjeevacationtagmail.com
Phone2413388

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Mark Fisher" <MIMI

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02420041

58p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00032938

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.