EFTA02413917

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 11

Reference

efta-02413917

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

To: jeevacationtagmail.com[[email protected]] From: Mark Fisher Sent Sun 6/6/2010 9:43:56 PM Jeffrey How are you? The therapy seems to be working. The doc has also been upping the doses. Side effects are what they are. If you need some fuel for your jet Ive got extra gas. The storage facility called me last week to ask if I am going forward with the deal they agreed to. I am attaching a previous email below regarding the artwork. On that note, the values for Basquiat works on paper were very good during the spring auctions. Please let me know. The storage warehouse told me to pay or the deal is off the table. Thank you for being you. All the best, Mark ARTWORK STORAGE INFO The Storage facility will give a year of future storage (value $2800)and payoff of $ 6300 owed for a single payment of $ 7000. (Savings $2100) Photography costs for slides for Authentication Committee $2700. Application fee for Authentication Committee $ 1800 ($100 per work X 18) Total $11,500 EFTA_R1_01476594 EFTA02413917

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02420041

58p

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00032938

OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01655731

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01983032

Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith Hello Warden Smith, mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health. I'd be grateful if you could email or call me at your earliest convenience. I'm free today after 2 p.m. Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday. Best wishes, Janet Irons 1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.