Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02423402DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02423402

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02423402
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Jeffrey Epstein(eeyacationagmail.comj From: Rich Kahn Sent Fri 8/27/2010 7:00:58 PM Subject RE: Cattle Maybe my email was confusing as there are two different issues: 1) Your lease with Eddie limits him to 50 head of cattle unless otherwise agreed upon by you in writing 2) The application with new Mexico stated that we will have at least 49 cattle Therefore there is a small window (1 cattle) for Eddie not to be in violation of his lease Rich Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 301 East 66th Street, Suite 10F New York, NY 10065 tel fax cel From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 2:50 PM To: Rich Kahn Subject: Re: Cattle i didn;'t belive that livestocl exempted a max, amount „onloy a minumum„ On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Rich Kahn a> wrote: In pursuit of understanding the cattle required to exempt your land I have reviewed Darren's files and found out the following: EFTA_R1_01490384 EFTA02423402 a. Grazing lease was signed by Eddie Burns in December 2005 (see attached) which states that a total of no more than 50 head of cattle will be pasteurized on the property at any one time b. Approved 5 year Application to New Mexico Stated that there would be 49 livestock (35 mother cows, 12 yearly hefers and 2 bulls) (see attached) I do not believe that Brice factored in Eddie's profit when we gave Renee her raise. I do not have the exact formula the county uses but I have called the following individuals in trying to track down this information: a) Janice Ahern 505-982-3610 from Rubin Katz Law firm (received her contact info from Darren) — she did not know answer off hand however said she would research for me next wcck. b) Reviewed Santa Fe Web Site and found out the following: a. Grazing valuation claims require proof of the presence of at least one head of livestock on a minimum land requirement of 80 acres (southern Santa Fe County) and 53 acres (northern Santa Fe County) and proof that the livestock has access to all of the agricultural land for the tax year. This may be in the form of a grazing lease, a personal property declaration of livestock that graze on the land, or some other proof of grazing use. Grazing, however, must be the primary use of the land in order to qualify. b. Website did not provide a clear answer of how many acres each livestock exempts so I called Larry Valdez 505-986-6300 from the Agriculture County Assessor's office and left 2 messages. c) Left a message with Paul Bardack' from Sutin Thayer Brown however he is not in today EFTA_R1_01490385 EFTA02423403 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA_R1_01490388 EFTA02423404

Technical Artifacts (7)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2423402
Phone2423403
Phone2423404
Phone505-982-3610
Phone505-986-6300

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.