Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02426404DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02426404

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02426404
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Jeeyacation[[email protected]] From: Warwick Wicksman Sent: Mon 4/5/2010 4:56:38 PM Subject: RE: LSJ Screening Room Sure. I will be in meetings from 10-2 PST. Can we talk at 2PST? Thanks, Warwick Wicksman, AIA Sent from my Windows Mobile phone. From: Jeevacation [email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:42 AM To: Warwick Wicksman Subject: Re: LSJ Screening oor .r Can we speak Sent from my iPhone On Apr 5, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Warwick Wicksman Jeffrey, I spoke with Doug earlier, and I understand no decision has been made yet on the Screening Room and Pool Area at Little St James. (Per your last email, the project is on hold for now, and you are reviewing the revised layout we provided.) I need payments on our last invoices, per our original signed contract. The invoices (attached) are from mid-February. I was hoping to have them cleared by the end of March, as I wrote in my email below, but have not seen any response yet. Please let me know what I need to do to get this resolved. I am getting a lot of heat from our CFO. Thanks, Warwick Warwick Wicksman, AIA Principal wrote: EFTA_R1_01495241 EFTA02426404 Gensler 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA From: Warwick Wicksman Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 6:52 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Cc: Doug Schoettle; Gary Kerney Subject: la) Hi Jeffrey. I spoke with Gary earlier today, looking for an update on the screening room and pool area. What is the status on the revised plans, and the latest invoices for us and our consultants' work? I was hoping to get current before the end of the month, which ends our fiscal year. Do you need any more info from us on these items? Thanks, Warwick Wicksman, AIA Sent from my Windows Mobile phone. <Epstein Arch CD.PDF> <Epstein Consultant DD.PDF> <Epstein Rcimb CD.PDF> EFTA_R1_01495242 EFTA02426405

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.