Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02436800DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02436800

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02436800
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Jeffrey Epstein[jeevacation©gmail.com] From: Sent: Tue 9/8/2009 10:15:53 PM Subject: 150m Euro Financing Is this of interest? If so, what's the best way to structure it? 150 million Euro Bridge Financing for Scholz-Edelstahl GmbH in Germany. Mr. Berndt-Ulrich Scholz is owner of Scholz AG (http://www.scholz- ag.de/english/index.html) Business had a turnover of close to 5 bn Euro in 2008 (3.5 bn. Euros in 2007) and 5,000 employees. Scholz AG is amongst the leading steel and metal scrap recycling companies in Europe; it is 100% owned by the family of Berndt-Ulrich Scholz. The business has a subsidiary Scholz-Edelstahl GmbH (http://www.scholz- edelstahl.de/), its a steel trading company with a group tonnage of 325,000 t p.a. and sales of 380 million Euro in 2007 (processing volume of 150,000 t p.a.; stock volume of 100,000 t p.a.). Scholz-Edelstahl supplies stainless steel in six different grades and specifications - Over the last years Scholz-Edelstahl, apparently, built up an inventory and speculated the wrong way; the banks are forcing Scholz to find a solution for his subsidiary: Scholz currently evaluates his options: Option 1: a bridge financing of approx. 150 million Euro for Scholz-Edelstahl: period of at least 2 years (to be confirmed), interest rate to be negotiated. Option 2: loan security - pledge current inventory of steel and guarantee of payment of the loan would be both given by the Scholz AG and by the owner Berndt- Ulrich Scholz. This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Asia Gateway Ltd. shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. Asia Gateway Ltd. Michelin House 81 Fulham Road London SW3 6RD UK EFTA_R1_01509399 EFTA02436800

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.