Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02439774DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02439774

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02439774
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Jeffrey Epsteinueevacation©gmail.com] From: William Murphy Sent: Tue 7/14/2009 2:10:07 PM Subject: RE: I just spoke with Steve at ETC. The phones that are currently installed at the house have 2 options for adjusting the display. The LCD display pivots approximately 30 degrees toward the user and then there is a base that pivots another 30 degrees or so. The 16 programmable buttons are currently configured to dial other extensions in the house. They can be configured to dial external speed dial numbers as you have requested. ETC would have to come out to the house and reprogram those buttons on the phone switch. Their hourly rate for this is $90/hour (we estimate a full day to reprogram the buttons, setup a machine for me to access remotely and install the new button layovers) . We will need to have a list of the names and numbers that should be assigned to each button for each phone. I assume that there will be a template we can apply to groups of phones depending on their user. There is a 32 button phone that we can upgrade to if the 16 button phones are not sufficient. Steve is getting a price for these now. These phones are nearly identical to the currently installed handsets with the exception of more programmable buttons. Also, ETC deals primarily with Panasonic and NEC phone systems. I have asked for pricing to replace the existing phone system with the Panasonic model. Should ETC come out to reprogram the buttons to have the speed dial assignments you request, they can bring the Panasonic handset with them for your review. I will forward you pricing for the upgraded NEC handset and pricing for a new phone system as soon as I get them. Thanks, WM EFTA_R1_01513549 EFTA02439774 From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 7:46 AM To: William Murphy Subject: Re: somone mustknow how„ its an ncc system On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:26 AM, William Murphy < Me wrote: I have received a manual for the current one, but it does not go into great detail on configuring buttons. I'll sec what I can get for a proposal today. Hope all is well. Wm Original Message From: Jeevacation <cevacation To: William Murphy Sent: Tue Jul 14 07:05:59 2009 ail.com> Have etc give us a proposal for new phone system. Have you revived a manual for the current one? Sent from my iPhone EFTA_R1_01513550 EFTA02439775

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2439774
Phone2439775

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00028741

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01579061

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031532

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.