Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02445717DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02445717

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02445717
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Paola Rengifo <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 6:11 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Cc: Ramon Alonso Subject: Re: LSJ CABANAS: Furniture Budget with Retail Cost The brand for the wardrobe is called PROMEM=RIA We buy directly from them, no dealer. Paola Rengifo Senior Design Associate <https://docs.google.com/a/r=dyca.com/uc?id=0B0ftZXiu_APTREN0Nm1WMDZJNTA&export=download> Mia=i Fl. 33131 +1(786)=502 4543 www.radyca.com <http://www.radyca.com/> [email protected] This e-mail,=and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) n=med herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential informati=n. This e-mail and any attached documents contain information which i= PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL, are protected by the Electronic C=mmunications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521 <tel:2510-2521> , Federal and St=te copyright laws, and are intended only for the use of the addressee(s) na=ed herein. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail= you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of=this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you ha=e received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at &nb=p; 786 502 4543 <tel:(786)%20502-4543> to permanently delete the original and any copy=of any e-mail and any printout thereof. On May 7, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] anailto:[email protected]» wrote: What dealer was the wardrobe from? On May 7, 2018, at 12:49 PM, Pao=a Rengifo < _ > w=ote: <LSJ-GSJ-Furniture Budget-With r=tail Cost.pdf> EFTA_R1_01541959 EFTA02445717

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.