Case File
efta-02451712DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02451712
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02451712
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
Sent:
Friday, September 16, 2016 8:11 PM
To:
William Blum
Subject:
Re: FW: Capital Gain provision/PR Act 22 equivalent
you are right. let me think?
<=iv class="gmail_extra">
On Fri, Sep 16, 20=6 at 4:04 PM, William Blue
wrote:
OK. From a federal perspective any property that you owned when =ou arrived could be made free of capital gains taxes
by the VI once ten ye=rs has passed. Do you have unrealized gains in such property? =ow long have you owned it?
What about other property?<=span>
We need to come up with a method that could =ttract new residents but does not overly benefit existing residents or it
=ill be attacked as harming revenues instead of enhancing them. So we=have to come up with a way to narrow benefits
for existing residents.</=>
Bill
William Blum I=Partner
SOLOMON BLUM HEYMANN LLP
=AO
=C2
=A0
New York, NY 10005
Tel
=td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
Email =C2
=A0
From: =span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-s=rif""> jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> j
Sent: Friday, Septemb=r 16, 2016 4:00 PM
To: William Blum
1
EFTA_R1_01551368
EFTA02451712
Subject: Re: FW: C=pital Gain provision/PR Act 22 equivalent
im a res=dent for 18 years. maybe its how the proerty becomes territory prope=ty after 10 years? , ill think about it
over the weekend
=p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, William Blum
wrote:
SOLOMON BLUM HEYMANN LLP
=C2
=A0
New York, N= 10005
Tel
Email
From:
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:53 PM jeffrey E. ([email protected] <[email protected]> )
Cc: Erika Kellerhals
Subjec=: Capital Gain provision/PR Act 22 equivalent
=idly>
Dear Jeff —
In thinking about how to draft these=provisions, I note that the PR Act 22 only applies to individuals who relo=ate to
Puerto Rico who have not resided there during the 6 years preceding=relocation. Clearly, this is designed to be
consistent with the stat=d purpose of Act 22 to encourage individuals to relocate to Puerto Rico, w=o would then
presumably pay tax there and stimulate the local economy, whi=e preventing current residents from getting a
"windfall".<=>
2
EFTA_R1_01551369
EFTA02451713
I am assuming that you would want to benefit from this law pers=nally and that you may have some unrealized capital
gains. So I need=to find a way to draft around this issue — i.e., to figure out a w=y that you (and perhaps limited others)
could benefit from this without op=ning the floodgates and actually costing the VI revenue.
=p class="MsoNormal">
In th=s regard, please give me some facts that might distinguish you from others=that might benefit from this but that
would accommodate the fact that you =ave been a USVI resident. In that regard, when did your USVI residen=t' start?
<= class="MsoNormal">A couple of ideas I had in this regard would be to pe=haps allow a partial capital gains exemption
(say a rate of 10% instead of=20%) for an individual who is currently a resident but who sells securitie= with unrealized
appreciation during a limited period, say a year, from th= date of enactment, regardless of when they took up residency.
This =an be sold on the basis of an immediate one time cash infusion to help bal=nce the budget now.
<=>
Another idea is a flat across the board re=uction in the capital gains rate without "date of residency acquis=tion"
restrictions. We couldn't realistically go to zero, =ut how about 15% for short term and 7.5% for long term —
something=like that? Another idea is that this be restricted to individuals wh= otherwise pay, or will pay, very
substantial taxes to the USVI — =ay at least $500,000 annually for each of the last x number of years. =AO Just
brainstorming.
<1=>
Please note that there are federal rest=ictions on this benefit which the Puerto Rico law meets and that we will n=ed to
be mindful of. These are designed to prevent gains that have a=crued while a person was a resident of the U.S. from not
being taxed by a =erritory to which the person relocated. The main rule here is that t=ere are no restrictions on
elimination of tax on gains for any person who =as already lived in a territory for 10 years. To the extent that the=period
of territorial residency is shorter, then an exemption is still all=wed for part of the gain, and the amount depends on
whether the gain is on=publically traded securities or other property. In the case of publi=ally traded securities, an
exemption is allowed for the exact portion of t=e taxpayer's gain that accrued during the "possessions hol=ing period".
That term is defined as the part of the taxpaye='s holding period that occurs while he is a territorial resident.=C2 For
other property, the limitation on gain exclusion test is similar=but since there is no market to which to mark the value of
the property at=the commencement of the possessions holding period, the gain is treated as=having accrued ratably
over the entire holding period with the result that=the exemption applies based on the ratio of the number of days in
the taxp=yer's possession holding period to the entire number of days in th= holding period.
<=LI>
Let me know your thoughts.</=>
William Blum I Partner
SOLOMON BLUM HEYMANN LLP =C2
=AO
=C2
3
EFTA_R1_01551370
EFTA02451714
New York, NY 10005
Tel
please note<=>
The information contained in t=is communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, ma= constitute
inside information, and is intended only for the use of =he addressee. It is the property of TEE Unauthorized use,
disclosure=or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohib=ted and may be unlawful. If you have
received this communication in =rror, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected]=m, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, includ=ng all attachments. copyright -all
rights reserved
=/div>
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may =e attorney-client privileged, may constitute
inside information, and is=intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JE= Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this communication or an= part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
r=ceived this communication in error, please notify us immediately by =eturn e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication =nd all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights=reserved
4
EFTA_R1_01551371
EFTA02451715
Technical Artifacts (6)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01904234
0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com>
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Lesley Groff
2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01356044
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02171805
4p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02476178
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.