EFTA02457100

From: Deepak Chopra Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2016 12:44 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Re: Yes -will have face time before-I hope. I'm back at the end of the =ont in NY. My next book, the galleys of which will be ready in 10 days is co writte= with a quantum physicist originally from MIT. I know my using the term it=s traditionalists, In the new book we move beyond quantum explaining -it d=es not explain life --only good for calculations and technology . Will send or bring galleys when we meet.=nbsp; We also use evolution in a different context -evolution of the universe.=You have given me much to think about --yes will keep in mind --humility g=es a long way , The argument re math and death applies to everything in li=e --love , sex, poetry, longing etc All love 2013 Costa Del Mar Road Carlsbad, CA 92009 The C=opra Foundation <http://www.choprafoundation.org/> <http://www.choprafoundation.=re> <http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/l/SlryZ4SaSrL_S=S00_SS115_.jpg> <http://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being=dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07-20> <http://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being=dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07-20> Super Genes: Unlock the Astonishing Power of Your DNA for Optimum Health and Wel=being chttp://www.am=zon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being/dp/0804140138/deepakchc=m07-20> <=span> EFTA_R1_01560664 EFTA02457100 From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2016 8:30:19 AM To: Deepak Chopra Subject: Re: evolution is only for living things. oth=r things express " change" , need not confuse the two.&nbs=; . I think the more you refer to similarities between y=ur views and nietsche schopenauer, the scientist, will r=treat a bit . I would forever banish the use of the word quantum. it is a math concept tha= is fact argues against your view. . quantum means small=st piece. ie digital, your views are analog , wh=leness is not quantum, unless you belive that consciousness in brok=n into tiny pieces that interact, throw the word in the dustbin= Tell the scientists that you recognize that the term c=uses concern so you have chosen to abandon it. humilit= will get you far. . your argument would be bolstered by science is =nly one method of understanding , mathematics its tool, . y=u are looking in realms opaque to mathematical inquiry, . hop=, for example. its value, how to employ it, why. = we will have some face time before the 18th of Sept . = promise you will be well prepared. you can also ask them if anyone theyve ever seen o= a death bed, looks to mathematics for the answer. ::)) On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Deepak Chopra <=pan dir="ltru> <nonlocal101=chopra.com <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: I wish there was a simpler way to say this! Krauss would be dismis=ive -I believe Nature at all levels displays -evolution , self organization, self regul=tion, interactive creativity, sentience ( fundamental awareness) , complem=ntarity ( wave/particle, mind/body ) The problem with physicalists is -they dismiss this as mere philosophy -=Krauss , Dawkins, Cox, Neil DeGrasse Tyson and others say -we have no use =or philosophy . Dawkins calls me a " willful obscurantist . " At a lecture in =altech recently he said I was more dangerous than religious fundament=list . Part of me wants to let it go --there is no winning or losing here = Will need your advice re Sept 18th meeting I'm finished teaching my course and leave for Australia on Tuesday. = All love The Chopra Foundation<=div> =img srcehttp://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/l/SlryZ4SaSrLSL500_SS115_=jpg"> =br> <http://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being=dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07- 20> 2 EFTA_R1_01560665 EFTA02457101 =a href="http://www.amazon.com/Super-Genes-Astonishing-Optimum-Well- Being=dp/0804140138/deepakchcom07-20" target="_blank">From: jeffrey E. «http://ww..amazon.com/Super-Genes- Astonishing-Optimum-Well-Being/dp/0804140138/deepa=chcom07-20> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2016 8:02:17 AM To: Deepak Chopra Subject: Nietzsche <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_Fri=drich_Nietzsche> . Opposed to this interpretation, the "will to power" can be und=rstood (or misunderstood) to mean a struggle against one's surroundings th=t culminates in personal growth, self-overcoming, and self-perfection, and=assert that the power held over others as a result of this is coincidental. Thus Nietzsche wrote: My idea is that every specific body strives to become master over all sp=ce and to extend its force (its will to power) and to thrust back all that=resists its extension. But it continually encounters similar efforts on th= part of other bodies and ends by coming to an arrangement ("union") with those of them that ar= sufficiently related to it: thus they then conspire together for power. A=d the process goes on.(29) <https://en.wi kipedia.org/wi ki/Wi Il_t=_powertcite_note-29> It would be possible to claim that rather than an attempt to 'dominate over=others', the "will to power" is better understood as the tenuous=equilibrium in a system of forces' relations to each other. While a rock, =or instance, does not have a conscious (or unconscious) "will", it nevertheless acts as a site of resistanc= within the "will to power" dynamic. Moreover, rather than sdomi=ating over others', "will to power" is more accurately positione= in relation to the subject (a mere synecdoche <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synecdoche> , both fictitious and necessary, for there is "no doer b=hind the deed," (see On the Genealogy of Mar.'s <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Genealogy_of_Morals> )) and is an idea behind the statement that words are "sedu=tions" within the process of self-mastery chttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-esteem> and self-overcoming <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3DSelf- overcoming&action=edit&redlink=1> . The "will to power" is thus a "cosmic&q=ot; inner force acting in and through both animate and inanimate objects. =ot just instincts but also higher level behaviors (even in humans) were to=be reduced to the will to power. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 3 EFTA_R1_01560666 EFTA02457102 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 4 EFTA_R1_01560667 EFTA02457103