Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02459762DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02459762

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02459762
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 12:49 PM To: Rupert Sheldrake Subject: Re: why would they influence rather than actually just b= a probability field themselves.. it =lso might be fun to think of " luck" as a morphic field = I think a strong argument can be made that the po=er laws zipfs pareto are the proofs of morphic fields..=A0 . forcing all natural phenomoma into the same shape of distribution that =as come before it its very very elegant.Q=A0 and as good a theory as any scientist can propose. On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 =t 6:49 AM, Rupert Sheldrake < Dear Jeffrey, Yes, I think Brian Josephson is indeed=rather scattered. <mailto > w=ote: I don't think De=pak is interested in deep theoretical issues so I don't think you'll succeed in moving him toward= the study of probabilities. But I agree with you that it would be better if he stayed away from quantum phenomena which he doesn=E24,4>t know much about and which in relation to medicine and consciousness seem to=me to create a cloud of scientific-sounding rhetoric which obscures rather tha= illuminates the problems. I'm all for the idea =f attractors, but I don't think mathematically so find it hard to grasp probability arguments. =/span>Although I think morphic fields are probability structures and work by influencing probabilities. We leave for a remote island in British Columbia on Wednesday and I'll be away for about 2 months. But still in email contact most of the time. <=u> Rupert On 9 Jul 2016, at 10:53, jeffrey E. wrote: he pointed me to brian jos=phson, seems scattered.? view? I m trying t= convince depak to move in the realm and study of probabiliti=s and stay away from quantum phenomena. . I think nature= distributions pushing elements to be average, describes many processes.=C2* . it appears that morphing all local faces into on= ( average ) appears to be beautiful. . if things are distribu=ed on a bell live or normal curve, just looking at the distrib=tion could lead one to think there is a force pushing toward the middle.=C240 maybe gravity is just that, 4>=A0 . probability of all things being equally distributed. appe=ring as a pseudo force . ( like centri=ugal force ). the central limit theorem might answ=r many mysteries. . derivation of the power laws f=r example. zipf, pareto. 4=A0 if the distribtuions are the attractors. having even = distribution of esoteric traits like happinesss could lead one to belive=C24> that if the distribution wants to stay constant. as one =oint on the curve ( the person) if they become happier, the pseufo force w=uld push someone else towards the average. . =C24> and yes - a few times depak and i roared with laughter.=C24, EFTA_R1_01565034 EFTA02459762 On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Rupert Sheldrake <mailto > wrote: Glad to hear about your meeting. Deepak is good=company, has a broad vision, and can be hilarious too. Rupert On 8 Jul 2016, at 21:18, jeffrey E. wrote: depak chopra was here this mor=ing, a great fan of yours 40=A0 please note The information contained in this commu=ication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may cons=itute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addre=see. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copyi=g of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited a=d may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, pl=ase notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], a=d destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all a=tachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The inform=tion contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-c=ient privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended onl= for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthor=zed use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereo= is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this<=r>communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail=or by e-mail to <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copie= thereof, 2 EFTA_R1_01565035 EFTA02459763 including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved =/div> please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may b= attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is =ntended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE=br>Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any=part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have re=eived this communication in error, please notify us immediately by r=turn e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication a=d all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights =eserved 3 EFTA_R1_01565036 EFTA02459764

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2459762
Phone2459763
Phone2459764

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.