Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02472839DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02472839

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02472839
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 5:09 PM To: Melanie Spinella Subject: Fwd: GOOFY< Forwarded messa e From: Yvonne Berger Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:=5 PM Subject: To: "Melanie Spinella Cc: John Castrucci Joe Avantario Richard Joslin "Jeffrey Eps=ein ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> )84q=ot; <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> =gt; MEMORANDUM TO: =AO Melanie Spinella =C2 =AO =C2 CC: =AO John Castrucci =C2 =AO =C2 =AO =C2 =AO =C2 =AO Joe Avantario =C2 =AO =C2 =AO =C2 =AO =C2 =AO Rich Joslin =C2 =AO =C2 =AO =C2 =AO =C2 =AO Jeffrey Epstein FROM: =AO Brad Wechsler DATE: =AO January 28, 2016 Summary EFTA_R1_01584960 EFTA02472839 1. In 2015, based on 180 hour= of usage, the plane costs you approximately $3.4MM/yr (operating costs) w=th approximately $400K of interest costs. Debt amortization in 2015 was $1.5MM. Amount of debt outstanding on the pl=ne today is $19.6MM and the loan is due in September of this year. Last qu=rter, the fmv (actual sales) of a G-V was approximately $14MM. Today, the =verage asking price market is $13MM. 2. Currently the plane is reg=stered under Part 135 as part of chartering business which means all fligh=s "technically" can be business related, thereby maximizing deductions. Last year because of various non-complying =ctivities, 62% of the flights or 111 hours of the 180 hours flown were 135=flights. The balance of the hours were flown under Part 91. Ap=llo hours were 42 of the 180. 3. The alternative to Part 13= is to abandon the chartering business and fly solely Part 91. A numerical=after-tax analysis comparing 135 to 91 for 2015 shows net after tax costs of roughly $2.6MM under Part 135 and $3MM u=der Part 91. (This assumes all non-Apollo hours are non-business which may=be too conservative). If 20% more of Part 91 flights were considered =80 business" there would be additional after tax savings under Part 91 of approximately $370K and the net after-t=x costs of Part 135 and Part 91 would be a push. 4. The key "life-styl= difference" between 91 and 135 is that there are less rigorous pi=ot rest rules under Part 91. 5. Generally speaking the tax=position is stronger under 135. 6. As a point of information =he charter rate for a G-V today is around $7,500/hr excluding flight incid=ntals of $300K. Your 180 hours would have meant an all-in "chartering" cost without incidentals of a=ound $1.35MM. 7. There is a lot of underlyi=g detail and complexity which can be walked through (Jeffrey has received =etailed numbers). The family office's bottom-line recommendation: is to continue under Part 135 as that is (i) is like=y to have a moderately lower net out of pocket cost to you; (ii) provides =he strongest tax position, (iii) can reduce net costs further, if, and as,=the percentage of Part 135 flights goes up and (iv) makes your plane marginally more attractive to a potentia= purchaser. 8. Structurally, we would hav= plane ownership be held directly by Avioneta which would enter into a man=gement services agreement with Jet Aviation. Avioneta would be owned by you and Debra. Wells Fargo (initial trustee for=purposes of a failed 1031 and Rance (current owner of plane) would disappe=r. 2 EFTA_R1_01584961 EFTA02472840 9. To us (and the experts) th=s is a close call but with 135 being the favorable route. Please note, how=ver, everyone is comfortable with reverting to Part 91. (Jeffrey's recommendation I believe). Let's discuss. please note =he information contained in this communication is confidential, may be =ttorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is in=ended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEEUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any p=rt thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have rece=ved this communication in error, please notify us immediately by ret=rn e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication an= all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights r=served 3 EFTA_R1_01584962 EFTA02472841

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2472839
Phone2472840
Phone2472841

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein email discusses $11 M tax strategy to reduce Medicare tax and leverage Obamacare benefits

The passage reveals a concrete tax‑avoidance scheme involving multi‑million dollar deductions and references to high‑profile individuals (Jeffrey Epstein, Leon Black) and potential manipulation of the Email dated Oct 17 2016 between Jeffrey Epstein and Brad Wechsler mentions $4 M RA and Artspace loss The strategy is linked to obtaining Obamacare (ACA) benefits by reducing taxable income. Leon Blac

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein‑linked family office emails reveal disputed $40‑$60 M advisory fees, alleged mis‑management of $6 B assets, undisclosed bank accoun...

The corpus of internal emails shows a high‑net‑worth client (Leon) working with Jeffrey Epstein and his advisors on complex structures (Phaidon, art partnerships, foreign trusts, 8865 filings). They d Emails reference a $6 billion family office with $250‑500 m annual income and dozens of entities, ba Repeated mention of a $40‑$60 million annual advisory fee arrangement with Epstein’s adviser, with

146p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein email discussing $4M and $7M tax deductions to avoid Medicare tax and gain Obamacare benefits

The passage reveals a possible tax‑avoidance scheme involving multi‑million‑dollar deductions tied to Medicare tax and Obamacare benefits, directly referencing Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. It p Email dated Oct 17, 2016 from Brad Wechsler to Jeffrey Epstein discusses $4 million RA and Artspace These amounts are said to reduce the 3.8% Medicare tax and be exempt from Medicare taxes per prior

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein‑Melanie Spinella family‑office emails reveal disputed $40‑$50M advisory fees, undisclosed accounts, tax‑saving schemes and possible...

The corpus contains detailed internal communications that reference large, undocumented cash balances (e.g., $11 M dormant accounts, $4 M in a drawer), disputed fee arrangements for services that alle Jeffrey Epstein claims to have saved the client $600 M in taxes through complex structures, yet alle References to $11 M in dormant accounts and $4 M cash in a staff member’s drawer suggest undisclos

146p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01802262

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01782954

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.