Case File
efta-02489448DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02489448
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02489448
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Lawrence Krauss
Sent:
Thursday, September 10, 2015 8:09 PM
To:
Noam Chomsky
Cc:
jeffrey E.;
Subject:
Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
Yup.
Lawren=e M. Krauss
Director, The Origins Pro=ect at ASU
Foundation Professor
School of Earth 84=Ssace Ex.loration and Ph sics Desartment =s an st le="bac round-color: r ba 255, 255, 255,
Sent from my iPhon=
On Sep 10, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Noam Chomsky «= href="mailto:c
cl
wrote:
I quite agree. And I'm pr=tty sure Lawrence does too.
From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> )
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 3:02 PM
To: Noam Chomsky
Cc: Lawrence Krauss
<mailto:
Subject: Re: an article you may both hate. or like../p>
I think religion plays a major positive role in many I=ves.. i dont like fanaticism on either side.. sorry
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Noam Chomsky <[email protected]> wro=e:
Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, bu= not total.
EFTA_R1_01609928
EFTA02489448
On confronting dogma, I of course agree — thou=h in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist
fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find r=tional discussion offensive — as, for example,
mainstream academics=find dismantling myths of "American exceptionalism" or =9Clsraeli self-defense" or Obama's
mass murder campaign, et=., offensive — so be it.
But I don't see why that should extend to ridi=ule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute
astrology, while recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may b=lieve it and should be treated with respect,
while their beliefs are confro=ted with evidence. I also don't see why we should ridicule re=igious dogma, just as I don't
think we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should r=spond to irrational belief with
argument and evidence, while recognizing th=t their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secul=r
dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometime=. For
example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentime=tal Realism in International Affairs informs us that
the US, unlike other c=untries, has a "transcendental purpose," and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its
purpose doesn =80 t matter because the facts are just "abuse of history"=while real history is "the evidence of history as
our minds reflect i=," then it's hard to avoid ridicule. But we should.&n=sp; There's no point ridiculing virtually the
entire IR profession a=d the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major=human
disasters.
On Davis, I frankly think that's a non-issue.&=bsp; If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions
of employment require (including following the law), then she can quit and I=ok for another job. As in any other such
case.
Noam
From: Lawrence Krauss [mailto
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM
To: Noam Chomsky <
<[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation=gmail.com»
Subject: an article you may both hate. or like.
h=pe all is well.
Lawrence
, jeffrey E.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/n=ws-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists
<http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-sh=uld-be-militant-atheists>
2
EFTA_R1_01609929
EFTA02489449
Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department</=:p>
<image001.png>
please not=
The information contained in this communication is
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
3
EFTA_R1_01609930
EFTA02489450
Technical Artifacts (8)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Email
[email protected]Phone
2489448Phone
2489449Phone
2489450URL
http://www.newyorker.com/news/n=ws-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheistsURL
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-sh=uld-be-militant-atheistsRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02000605
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02527774
2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02009030
3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
3p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02082839
5p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.