Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02489777DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02489777

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02489777
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:37 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Bitcoin is on the verge of a constitutional crisis Seen this? > Bitcoin is on the verge of a constitutional crisis By Timothy B. Lee > Aug 18 2015 > <http://www.vox.com/2015/8/18/9168977/bitcoin-constitutional-crisis> > The Bitcoin community is facing one of the most momentous decisions in its=six-year history. The Bitcoin network is running out of spare capacity, and=two increasingly divided camps disagree about what, if anything, to do abou= the problem. > If these two sides fail to reach a consensus, the Bitcoin network could =80 according to one side, at least — slowly grind to a halt as t=e number of transactions exceeds the network's capacity to process them. Ev=n worse, if a fix for this problem is forced through prematurely, it could s=lit the Bitcoin network in two and permanently damage public trust in the n=twork. > The argument is the closest thing the Bitcoin community has had to a const=tutional crisis. Bitcoiners are trying to figure out who, if anyone, has th= authority to make technical changes to the Bitcoin network's foundations. 5= far, neither side in the increasingly heated debate has shown much willing=ess to compromise. > The Bitcoin network is running out of capacity > The Bitcoin network processes transactions in units called "blocks," which=are created about every 10 minutes. To prevent malicious parties from clogg=ng up the system with spam, the original Bitcoin software limited the size o= each block to one megabyte, which corresponds to a few thousand transactio=s. When Bitcoin was created in 2009, that left plenty of room for growth. > But Bitcoin usage has been growing, bringing the network closer and closer=to its maximum capacity. Right now, the network is only 30 to 40 percent fu=l on average, but it sometimes gets congested during periods of high demand= causing delays for users. And if current growth continues, things could ge= a lot worse in the next year or two, as the network gets closer to 100 per=ent capacity. > And if Bitcoin is going to become a mainstream payment platform, it's goin= to have to grow a lot more. Bitcoin handles tens of thousands of transacti=ns per day. Visa handles tens of millions. To compete with Visa and other m=instream payment technologies, the network is going to need more capacity. > Changing the limit is easy — if everyone agrees > The limit is just a number in the Bitcoin software. If that number were ch=nged to a higher value, the Bitcoin network would have more capacity. > The difficulty is that this only works if everyone agrees to raise the lim=t. The Bitcoin network is built on consensus. If some parts of the Bitcoin n=twork raise the limit and others don't, the network would be split in two. H=ving two EFTA_R1_01610458 EFTA02489777 competing versions of the Bitcoin network running simultaneously w=uld be catastrophic. It would destroy trust in the Bitcoin network, since u=ers could never be sure which transactions were official. And it would like=y cause the value of bitcoins — the unit of currency — to p=unge, as people questioned whether the network had a future at all. > [snip] <?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.O.dtd"> <plist version=.0"> <dict> <key>conversation-id</key> <integer>107008</integer> <key>date-last-viewed</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>date-received</key> <integer>1439987831</integer> <key>flags</key> <integer>8590195713</integer> <key>gmail-label-ids</key> <array> <integer>6</integer> <integer>2</integer> </array> <key>remote-id</key> <string>535563</string> </dict> </plist> 2 EFTA_R1_01610459 EFTA02489778

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.