Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02492122DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02492122

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02492122
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Gianni Serazzi < Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 2:49 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: For the italian company I think it will be difficult. Gian=arlo is the Director of the company and I need him to remain it. If I have=80% he would probably still do it, if I have 50% even for a few years I do='t think he will accept. There are also other legal implications I wil= look into. On the French company it's much easier =s it's a virgin structure and we could set it up so that we can see 10=% of the invoicing done there separate from Italy. =hx G On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Jeffrey E. <=a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com> wrote: the speratation is somewhat artificial, so i think it would be pr=bematic. On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:16 AM= Gianni Serazzi «mailto = target=> I think svetlana might want to invest 800 e. =C240 in return she should receive 50 percent of the co. but you wou=d have the right to buy back half of her position anytime in the next thre= years for 800 e. . in essence leaving you with 75 % aft=r she had her money back, as hers is the most at risk , since the pr=jections have been off dramatically, On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:32 AM= Gianni Serazzi < > wrote: <mailto = target=> Thank you for your support I agree=that the situation was degenerating from last summer. I had to wait to int=rvene as I was still in the group and I wanted in any case to get Giancarl='s shares back in case things went bad. I am now sure I will fix it You have a clear situation in front of you, how woul= you structure it the best? Thx On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:21 PM, jef=rey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: understood, as you are well aware, =he structures could range from a secured loan to biz and you persona=ly . security could not be subject to litigation. =C2. ex. structured so the burden is on you . not the lender. the s=cuirty is transferred on closing and you get it back when money is repaid.=not the reverse, . i see that the EFTA_R1_01614652 EFTA02492122 decline is over a year old.=C240 as you say re jean carlo, but obvious by nov. of 14/4>=A0 , we are now sept 15. I only see numbers , not mother=C24> or im sure a wide range of jean carlos excuses. On Sun, Aug=16, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Gianni Serazzi <-> w=ote: I understand and I t=ank you for your consideration. The 800 will go to cover net working capital coming from growth and to get =ne final director for the print division. Of the other 3 directors one is =erforming really well and the other 2 I just brought them over to these po=itions in July. If just one of them makes it we will be at 600k profit. Ab=ut 150-200k need to go to Paris to bring in a strong team and finance net =orking capital. As per the forecast vs actual you see very clearly the deter=oration coming in the summer of 2014. Giancarlo started spending 2 days in=the agency, fired the director and then dealt with the problems of h=s mother. I am confident that I will put it again on the right track. Not =asy but we will become as strong as fashion. On Aug 16, 2015 2:33 PM, "Jeffrey E." =Itjeevacation@=mail.com <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: all the agencies , now sell for roughly 50 - 60=perecent of revenue, used to be 100 -125%. no valu= admitteldy to contingent case recovery, which could/ should be out=of the deal. ie you keep it . . where does t=e 800 go, ? if it is to factor receivables. . one thing=C24, if it is to buy bookers. another, very aggressive, prio= projections are a big neg factor. in valuations. very big.4>=A0 .. some months are off by hundreds of percent.. not good. .40=A0 I would like you to make a lot of money on your deal. =C24, so ownership , is not relevant getting the 800 bac= with security woudl be the issue, On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Gianni S=razzi < <mailto » wrote: I think your consideration is accurate. On top of it you should factor in -800k would go entirely into the company so that should be added as post mo=ey valuation -on top what is the value of new management (myself) coming in at zero sala=y? If we use market valuation that's quite an asset -I only count the cash once we have it, however we have a lawsuit going on =ith QVC the big client lost that stole our models internalizing them that =he lawyer says will pay minimum 300k and max 800k within 1 to 2 years -also please remember that it's written Ebitda but it's cash genera=ion pure and simple Adding these aspects it brings you to the 4m post money valu=tion that I honestly believe to be a fair value if I were sitting on the o=her side of the table Thx 2 EFTA_R1_01614653 EFTA02492123 On Aug 16, 2015 5:03 AM, "Jeffrey E." =Itjeevacation@=mail.com <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: ive looked carefully at the bad projections and the c=rrent numbers only ebitda. it looks as if the valu= and comps only give it a 1.5--2.2 value . . =br>-- =please note The information contained in this communication is =onfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside i=formation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the=property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this c=mmunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlaw=ul. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy t=is communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. cop=right -all rights reserved =C240 please note The informat=on contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-cli=nt privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only =or the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthoriz=d use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof =s strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this return e-mail o= by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies =hereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved </=iv> 3 EFTA_R1_01614654 EFTA02492124 =C2* please note The informat=on contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-cli=nt privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only =or the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthoriz=d use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof =s strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this return e-mail o= by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies =hereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved </=iv> please note Th= information contained in this communication is confidential, may be at=orney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intezded only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE =nauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any par= thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have receiv=d this communication in error, please notify us immediately by retur= e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and a=l copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights rese=ved 4 EFTA_M_01614655 EFTA02492125

Technical Artifacts (7)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2492122
Phone2492123
Phone2492124
Phone2492125

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.