Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02515310DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02515310

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02515310
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 12:55 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Re: NYTimes: Are Women Better Decision Makers? Why would business be any different th=n other organizations -- that is, the performance of the organization is be=ter if it functions effectively as a team? Not about making people ha=py, but making them feel respected, secure, etc. Sent from my=i Pad On Oct 19, 2014, at 8:49 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: business is not about kee=ing the group happy , it is always about results. short time vs long t=rm . not firing people , seems to be the failure of many empathetic c=os. leading to disaster. On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Kathy Ruemmler wrote: Yes, but empathy is different than consensus-bu=lding. The former comes from strength, the latter can sometimes be bu= is often not. Sent from my iPad On Oct 19, 2014, at 6=38 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: though i appreciate the attempt. very very=poor science.. 1. pain threshold for ice water.&nb=p; 2. consensus, is the most profitable decision in only certain circumstanres. 3. as you and I know , leadership, is not often about=consensus. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Kathy Ruemmler rote: <http:qwww.nytimes.com/2014/10/19/opinion/sunday/are-women-better-decision- makers=html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share> When stressed, men are more prone to taking risky bets with little payoff. Sent from my iPad EFTA_R1_01649614 EFTA02515310 please note The=information contained in this communication is confidential, may be atto=ney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intende= only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unau=horized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part the=eof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received thi= communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mai= or by e-mail to <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies=thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved </=iv> please note =div>The information contained in this communication is confidential, may=be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is=intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE=br>Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any p=rt thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have recei=ed this communication in error, please notify us immediately by retur= e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all=copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserve= 2 EFTA_R1_01649615 EFTA02515311

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainqwww.nytimes.com
Phone2515310
Phone2515311

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.