EFTA02526963

From: Sent: To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Tuesday, October 20, 2009 8:39 PM Re: what deals affect both of us„ be specific. so far i don'tbelieve yo= have lived up to any of our deals . so please explain On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:31 PM, «= href="mailto " > wr=te: I am definitel= not suggesting to leave for a month, I thought I made that clear. I thoug=t what would be a nice break is not to be 'questioned' about doing=what you decide even if it is in conflict with one of our prior agreements= And this 'time of no expectations' applies to the deals that affe=t both of us, not just you..that is what I meant by 'I can spend my ti=e as I like too.' It was a suggestion to start with no baggage. If you=don't like it, then what do you want to do? I didn't say I don't trust you, I said I couldn't trust tha= what you say will happen. Sent via BlackBerry=by AT&T From: Jeffrey Epst=in <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:01:03 -0400 To: </=>** <mailto Subject: Re: > > why don't you re=read it.. you have broken your pro=ise„ you want to spend the weekend with i don't trust you. , i=can(t trust anything you say. - last night i asked for suggestions --yo= offered silence„ i asked what the non-easy way out was.. you offered =ilence. now that you want to leave for a month.. spend the time as you =ee fit. ( Is that supposed to be different than how you have spent your=time till now.? The question i have asked for months is what is it t=at you would like to contribute„ I have asked that with ,and each =ne of your shrinks. to suggest that what you will now contribute is to =Ilow me to do as i please„ or in your words supporting my likes. that is =ot a contribution at all. .. If you were not there , it would be no differ=nt„ you seem to suggest your contribution is that you will stop hitting m= in the head, ( like the village idiot, who hits himself). so that it w=ll feel good when it stops.. I am trying to be a friend„ you tell me t=e important date is the 23, please forward info that confirms that.<=r> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM, < <mailto > wrote: I am sorry you see the email as an attact. It was meant as an explanation o= how I got to my suggestion for moving forward. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T EFTA_R1_01667389 EFTA02526963 The information contained in this c=mmunication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the a=dressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, di=closure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, p=ease notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], =nd destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. The information contain=d in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privile=ed, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the a=dressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, di=closure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, p=ease notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy thi= communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. 2 EFTA_R1_01667390 EFTA02526964