Case File
efta-02557279DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02557279
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02557279
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
Sent:
Monday, December 4, 2017 12:59 PM
To:
Misha Gromov
why is transfinite recursion <https://en.wikipedia.=rewikiirransfinite_recursion> a good model for und=rstanding -
the proof that the result is well-defined uses transfi=ite induction. Let F denote a (class) function F to be defin=d on the
ordinals. The idea now is that, in defining F(a) for =n unspecified ordinal a, one may assume that F(3) is alre=dy defined
for all a < a =nd thus give a formula for F(a) in terms of these F(Q=B2). It then follows by transfinite induction that there
is one and only one function satisfying the recursion formula up to and including a.
(more will be given later): define function F by letting F=a) be the smallest ordinal not in the set conversation-id 22029
date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1512392341 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 remote-id 775029
1
EFTA_R1_01716262
EFTA02557279
Technical Artifacts (4)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Email
[email protected]Phone
12392341Phone
2557279URL
https://en.wikipedia.=rewikiirransfinite_recursionForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.