Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02557279DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02557279

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02557279
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 12:59 PM To: Misha Gromov why is transfinite recursion <https://en.wikipedia.=rewikiirransfinite_recursion> a good model for und=rstanding - the proof that the result is well-defined uses transfi=ite induction. Let F denote a (class) function F to be defin=d on the ordinals. The idea now is that, in defining F(a) for =n unspecified ordinal a, one may assume that F(3) is alre=dy defined for all a < a =nd thus give a formula for F(a) in terms of these F(Q=B2). It then follows by transfinite induction that there is one and only one function satisfying the recursion formula up to and including a. (more will be given later): define function F by letting F=a) be the smallest ordinal not in the set conversation-id 22029 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1512392341 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 remote-id 775029 1 EFTA_R1_01716262 EFTA02557279

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone12392341
Phone2557279
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.=rewikiirransfinite_recursion

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.