EFTA02569119

Date

Unknown

Source

DOJ Data Set 11

Reference

efta-02569119

Pages

Persons

Integrity

Summary

Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0upvotesShare

Post Reddit

Save Post Watch

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

From: Lesley Groff < Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 7:13 PM To: Epstein Jeffrey Subject: Rich and Darren tomorrow what time? Rich and Darren say they are to come back over tomorrow to meet with =ou...Rich can be here from 10:15 on Darren is requesting 11:00 on...You =ave Ed Epstein for lunch at 12:30 ...Leon Black is booked until 4 and =as a 6:30 dinner...Melanie has to speak to Leon about the 1.5 hour =eeting you are requesting (tentative from 4:30-6:00) Would you like Rich and Darren to come at 11:00 or afternoon like 3:00? <?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD KIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/Propertylist-1.0.dtd"> <plist version=.0"> <dict> <key>conversation-id</key> <integer>253452</integer> <key>date-last-viewed</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>date-received</key> <integer>1367435587</integer> <key>flags</key> <integer>8590195713</integer> <key>gmail-label-ids</key> <array> <integer>2</integer> </array> <key>remote-id</key> <string>296802</string> </dict> </plist> 1 EFTA_R1_01736310 EFTA02569119

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown