Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02573494DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02573494

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02573494
Pages
7
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Valeria Chomsky < Sent: Thursday, November , : To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Fwd: trust for the letter Noam has requested to Deborah or for the accounting: nothing= Do you understand what is going on? Forwarded messa e From: Noam Chomsky Date: Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 5:03 PM Subject: Re: trust To: Deborah Pechet Quinan < Cc: Valeria Chomsky That sounds right to us. Noam On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Deborah Pechet Quinan wrote: > Dear Noam, > I will do so. Do you want me to hold off regarding the memo I was plannin= to prepare for you, pending the discussion with your children? The memo m=y not be necessary yet. > Best, > Deborah > Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity and typos. > On Oct 29, 2017, at 2:20 PM, Noam Chomsky > wrote: > Thanks for the informative letter. I would appreciate it if you could cr=ft a letter, as you suggest, which I will use to contact all three childre=. > Thanks > Noam Forwarded message > From: Deborah Pechet Quinan > Date: Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:56 PM > Subject: Fwd: trust > To: Noam Chomsky > Cc: ene Candy EFTA_R1_01743535 EFTA02573494 > Dear Noam, > You are waiting for me to provide guidance as to how you can regain contr=l of the trust funds. My plan is to prepare a memo for you outlining your=options in light of the trust terms. I anticipate being able to spend som= time on this over the weekend, along with reviewing the drafts of your es=ate planning documents. Once I have sent the memo to you we can discuss y=ur thoughts and we can then respond to Max. Unfortunately this is a diffic=lt situation, not simple and straightforward, because of the terms of the =rust and fiduciary law applicable to trusts. Please see my email of 10/17=for an explanation of some of the issues. > In some situations a trust is drafted so that you would have the right to=remove and replace the trustee, and in doing so perhaps find a trustee tha= would not inquire so diligently as to your personal financial circumstanc=s before making a principal distribution to you. In this regard, please r=fer to my email of 10/17 where I summarize the trustee removal, resignatio= and appointment provisions. The trustees can both resign at any time. The= appoint successors subject to your approval. If they agree to resign you =an find a new independent trustee whom they can appoint. If not, you can r=move them but only with the approval of a majority of your children. Do yo= think your daughters would agree to remove Max and Harry? If so you could=then appoint a successor. You would need to find an independent trustee. = can help you craft a letter to your daughters if you think they might agr=e to do this. > My one additional thought right now that I need to review more closely is=that Harry, not being the independent trustee, should not have a say in th= distribution decision. If there is nothing in the trust to contradict thi= interpretation (I need to review the trust again) then Max alone has the =ower. However this would likely not change the analysis that Max believes =e needs to go through since he is accountable to all beneficiaries. He be=ieves he needs some level of financial information from you but in my view=that does not need to be detailed. I can discuss with him what level of d=tail would satisfy him; however, if my understanding is correct that you d= not wish to provide him with any backup for his distribution decision, th=n we should evaluate the removal option and any other strategies I may be =ble to come up with. > Unfortunately this is not a simple situation and I will do my best to out=ine some additional options for you. In the meantime please let me know yo=r thoughts regarding the above. I am available for a call as well, at you= convenience. > Best, > Deborah > Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity and typos. > Begin forwarded message: > From: Max Kohlenberg < > Date: October 27, 2017 at 1:21:50 PM EDT > To: Noam Chomsky > Cc: "Deborah Pechet Quinan, Esq." <- > Subject: Re: trust > Hello Noam - > • I'm afraid I cannot send the money you have requested without further dis=ussion with you and I also feel I cannot have such a discussion with you w=thout Deborah's knowledge and participation, as she is your attorney. Ple=se also note that any distributions from the trusts would also involve Har=y, who is the co-trustee of the trusts. > As you will see, I have again copied Deborah on my reply. I will be glad=to follow up with a meeting or a call when I return, next week. 2 EFTA_R1_01743536 EFTA02573495 > Thanks, > Max > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message > From: Noam Chomsky > Date: 10/27/17 5:14 > To: Max Kohlenberg > Subject: Fwd: trust > There seems to be some confusion. I was responding to your letter of Oct= 16, in which you said you would be getting back to me the next day. That=was the last time we were in touch. Since I didn't hear from you, I wrote=again, last night. > My letter to you explained the reasons for my request for a distribution =rom the marital trust. To repeat, "I would like to get on with my life an= work without delay. I've worked hard for 70 years, put away a substantia= sum of money. I surely have the right to access it." > I don't see what further explanation is necessary, or why it is necessary=to bring Deborah into this. I could add that as I approach 90, having wor=ed hard for 70 years and put away a substantial sum of money, I not only h=ve the right to some peace and tranquillity to go on with my life and work= but also to do so without facing an inquisition. > If you are unable to transfer the money this week , could you please deta=l for me the reasons behind the decision. > Thanks, > Noam Forwarded message > From: Max Kohlenberg < > Date: Wed, Oct 25, 2017 > Subject: RE: trust > To: Noam Chomsky < > Cc: Deborah Pechet Quinan < > Good morning (from Scotland) Noam — > When we were last in touch on this I replied with a cc to Deborah (who I=have copied again here) and I understood that you, she and Valeria had dis=ussed my need (as trustee) to know something more about the background for=this request and your anticipated needs going forward. Deborah got back t= me and indicated that the call she and I had tentatively scheduled was be=ng cancelled. 3 EFTA_R1_01743537 EFTA02573496 > If you would like me to reschedule a call with Deborah, or a meeting, I=E2404kd be glad to do that. I'll be back on Tuesday. > My best, > Max > From: Noam Chomsky (m > Sent: Thursday, October , > To: Max Kohlenberg > Subject: Re: trust > I didn't hear from you about this, and would like to what is happening in=this matter. I would like to get on with my life and work without delay. =I've worked hard for 70 years, put away a substantial sum of money. I sur=ly have the right to access it. Could you let me know where this stands. > Noam > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Max Kohlenberg c > Thanks for the quick reply Noam. I will get back to you tomorrow. > Max > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message 4 EFTA_R1_01743538 EFTA02573497 > From: Noam Chomsky > Date: 10/16/17 9:14 PM (GMT-05:00) > To: Max Kohlenberg < > Subject: Re: trust > I meant $500,000. > Noam > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Max Kohlenberg < > Forgive me for asking Noam, but did you mean $500,000, or $50,000? > Thanks, > Max > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message > From: Noam Chomsky <[email protected]> > Date: 10/16/17 6:44 PM (GMT-05:00) > To: Max Kohlenberg rote: 5 EFTA_R1_01743539 EFTA02573498 > Subject: trust > Dear Max, > I would like to ask for a distribution from one of the marital trusts, fo= $500,000, to deal with current expenses of mine. > Thanks for your consideration > Noam > NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if any, is intended solely for p=rmitted use by authorized recipients. If you are not an authorized recipie=t of this email, your retention, transmission, disclosure, or use of this =mail is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify the=sender and delete this email and its attachments from your devices and sys=ems. > NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if any, is intended solely for p=rmitted use by authorized recipients. If you are not an authorized recipie=t of this email, your retention, transmission, disclosure, or use of this =mail is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify the=sender and delete this email and its attachments from your devices and sys=ems. <?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version=.0"> <dict> <key>conversation-id</key> <integer>27093</integer> <key>date-last-viewed</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>date-received</key> <integer>1509636658</integer> <key>flags</key> <integer>8590195717</integer> <key>gmail-label-ids</key> 6 EFTA_R1_01743540 EFTA02573499 <array> <integer>6</integer> <integer>2</integer> </array> <key>remote-id</key> <string>764508</string> </dict> </plist> 7 EFTA_R1_01743541 EFTA02573500

Technical Artifacts (10)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2573494
Phone2573495
Phone2573496
Phone2573497
Phone2573498
Phone2573499
Phone2573500
Phone9636658
URLhttp://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.