Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02578071DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02578071

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02578071
Pages
6
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 5:23 AM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: trust ok with me , but i would add , if you are not =oing to transfer the money this week , please detail for me the reasons be=ind your decision. thx On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Noam Cho=sk > wrote: I almost never use the phone, and don't=really want to get into a discussion with him. I'd prefer to kee= to mail, which will be on the record, no opportunity for misrepresentatio=. So, do you think that letter is ok? On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:32 PM,=jeffrey E. <[email protected] <[email protected]» wrote: Why don't you call him=C2* On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:29 AM Noam Chomsky ,./g=; wrote: Max may believe that= but I find it virtually impossible to believe. Max hasn't broug=t up anything of the sort in his letters to me. If he does, or I see=any other indication of it, I'll react at once. My =eeling is that I should first respond to his letter, basically reiterating=what I said. Do you think I ought to send the letter I sent you, bef=re bringing Deborah into it? I'd like to see if I can work this =ut directly with Max before taking any further steps. What d= you think? On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 a= 11:45 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Max is s trustee afraid of being=sued by your children . It is the trust money not yours . If two of =hree of your children agree no issue, if not Deborah would have to take s=eps On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:36 PM Noam Chomsky wro=e: EFTA_R1_01751442 EFTA02578071 This is the letter I recei=ed from Max, almost immediately after I sent him the letter below. H=re's what I was thinking of responding. There seems to be some confusion. I was responding to y=ur letter of Oct. 16, in which you said you would be getting back to me th= next day. That was the last time we were in touch. Since I di=n't hear from you, I wrote again, last night. I don't see what further explanation =s necessary, or why it is necessary to bring Deborah into this. I co=ld add that as I approach 90, having worked hard for 70 years and put away=a substantial some of money, I not only have the right to some peace and t=anquillity to go on with my life and work, but also to do so without facin= an inquisition. could also add so=ething about the advice and practices of Max and Sam that led to a situati=n where for the first time in my life, I have to face financial problems .=C24> But maybe not] Forwarded message From= Max Kohlenberg t; Date: Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:55 AM Subject: RE: trust T=: Noam Chomsky < Cc: Deborah Pechet Guinan Good morning (from Scotland) Noam -<=> When we were last in touch on this I replied=with a cc to Deborah (who I have copied again here) and I understood=that you, she and Valeria had discussed my need (as trustee) to know something more about the background for this req=est and your anticipated needs going forward. Deborah got back to me=and indicated that the call she and I had tentatively scheduled was being =ancelled. If you would like me to reschedule a call wi=h Deborah, or a meeting, I'd be glad to do that. I'l= be back on Tuesday. My best, 2 EFTA_R1_01751443 EFTA02578072 Max From: Noam Chomsky (mailto Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 6:43 AM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: Re: trust <=div> I didn't hear from you about this, and would lik= to what is happening in this matter. I would like to get on with my=life and work without delay. I've worked hard for 70 years, put =way a substantial sum of money. I surely have the right to access it. Could you let me know where this stands.<=> Noam On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Max Kohlenberg <=a href="mailto target="_blank"> wrote: Thanks for the quick reply Noam. I will get ba=k to you tomorrow. Max S=nt from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Noam Chomsky Date: 10/16/17 9:14 PM (GMT-05:00) 3 EFTA_R1_01751444 EFTA02578073 To: Max Kohlenberg <mailto: Subject: Re: trust I meant $500,000. Noam href="mailto On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:00 PM Max Kohlenber <=a target="_blank" wrote: Forgive me for asking Noam, but did you mean $500,00=, or $50,000? Thanks, Max S=nt from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Noam Chomsky Date: 10/16/17 6:44 PM (GMT-05:00) To: <mailt Subject: trust 4 EFTA_R1_01751445 EFTA02578074 Dear Max,<=u> =/span> I would like to ask =or a distribution from one of the marital trusts, for $500,000, to deal wi=h current expenses of mine. =/span> Thanks for your cons=deration =/span> Noamq=pan> =/span> =/span> </=iv> 4;>=A0 please note The information contained in this communicati=n is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute=inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. =t is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of =his communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may=be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please n=tify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and =estroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved please =ote 5 EFTA_R1_01751446 EFTA02578075 The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved 4,=A0 please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged =may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved --94eb2c0328a6dOdda7055c807b60-- conversation-id 27093 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1509081786 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 remote-id 762699 6 EFTA_R1_01751447 EFTA02578076

Technical Artifacts (10)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2578071
Phone2578072
Phone2578073
Phone2578074
Phone2578075
Phone2578076
Phone9081786

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.