Case File
efta-02581206DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02581206
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02581206
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Sent:
Monday, February 24, 2014 9:23 PM
To:
Lesley Groff; Richard Kahn
Subject:
Re: Joe Thakuria
give him 10k
=div class=" mail uote">On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Lesley Groff
<mailto
> wrote:
Sent from my =Phone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Joseph Thakuria
<mailtha
Date: =February 24 2014 4:08:44 PM EST
To: Lesley Groff
gt;
Cc: Rich Kahn
Subject: Re: Jeffr=y Epstein
Really?
Ok, done (pending approval through Partners/MGH =RB for my formal research study - about 5 weeks as
we discussed).
Can we get a little additional software budget for s=condary analyses? At least the $4K worth we would
have gotten with an exom=? The rationale for this is so we don't have to completely rely only &=uot;black box"
interpretation by Illumina. In my experience, Illumna&=39;s genome interpretation has been historically subpar. Not
surprising si=ce they are primarily a next gen DNA sequencing instrumentation company - =ot really focused on analyses
and genomic analyses software (though they d= have their own). It may be that we don't pull up a lot of extra info =ith
additional software. But we won't know that one way or the other r=lying only on Ilumina's interpretation.
Anyway, let me know. The budget/invoice is complete if =e all we are going after is one item: a rapid
turnaround whole genome thro=gh Illumina for $11,400. I do think this is the best (highest quality) who=e genome you
can get for the money but it is disappointing to me that thei= pricing has been essentially unchanged for years (the
reason I expected t=is to be in the $5K range). I do think I can find a whole genome for aroun= $SK (perhaps through
CGI) but again I'd question the quality of that =enome. (That was the research rationale for getting 1 from Illumina and 1
=rom CGI to compare results if the funding were available for this).
EFTA_R1_01757292
EFTA02581206
Let me know if this needs any further clarification.
Thanks again,
Joe
> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:=6 PM, Lesley Groff
Hi Joe&h=llip;below is Jeffrey's reply:
<mailto
let= start and do the full genome with rapid turn around. 11, 400
On Feb 24, 2014, at 3:38=PM, Joseph Thakuria
cmailto
> wrote:
Hi Lesley and Rich,
Lesley, can you forward the following info to Jeffrey?
So when I sent the initial invoice I didn't have =he actual whole genome costs through
Illumina which are $9500 for a normal=turn around time and $11,400 for "rapid turn around time". The r=pid turn
around time isn't necessary in Jeffrey's case. And, in my=opinion, if the budget is only $5000, I think the most bang for
his buck (=nd this is what I would do for myself with only $5000 to spend) is to get =n exome done. I should be able to
get this through Ambry and through the s=me research protocol we'll be suing for the YPO study participants for=$1000.
I would then use the remainder to purchase genome analyses tools (t=ere won't be enough for any servers) to perform
secondary analyses on =he exome.
The exome only represents around 1.5% of the genome b=t this is the medically most
important part of the genome (at least given =ur current knowledge) and represents all the coding regions in all our
20,=00+ genes.
If this sounds good to Jeffrey, I'll produce a Tina= budget before the end of the week that
specifies which of the tools we L=;11 be able to get with the remaining $4000. (I need to finish pricing and=tallying up
features among the 6 I listed to determine which one(s) will g=t.
This won't of course cover any cellular work or oth=r items in the full invoice but I would
still recommend moving at least so=e fibroblast cell lines aliquots from the PGP to our new study so we can w=rk on
those when funding from other sources is available.
I would also just throw out there for Jeffrey's con=ideration that the same ambitious
protocol for a stripped down clinical ne=t generation DNA sequencing laboratory could be pursued with a similar bucket
on the commercial side - and I've already been in discussion with o=hers about funding this effort. Having followed this
space since 2005 I ca= say the timing is very good for this type of business right now. Again, i= hasn't even been more
than a year that this technology has transition=d into clinical care. So if this is something Jeffrey would be interested =n
pursuing as an investor with an equity stake, rather than as a philanthr=pic grant for academic research, that would be
another route for going ahe=d with the full project that he may be interested in discussing further.</=iv>
2
EFTA_R1_01757293
EFTA02581207
Rich, I'll leave it to you on how you'd like to-handle the $5000 invoice. I could receive
this as a lump sum and account f=r how it is spent. I would expect all of it to be used up before the end o= the summer.
We can also arrange it so that as the various vendors (sequen=ing and software) provide invoices, your office pays them
directly. Either=way is fine with me. I don't have a preference.
Thanks and let me know if I can provide any clarificati=ns. Again, I'll follow up with an
invoice capped at $5K before the end=of the week (assuming you agree with the above).
Joe Thakuria
<=iv class=" mail
uote">On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Lesley Groff
<mailto
> wrote:
Hello Joe. I have Jeffrey's accountant o= this email as well, Rich Kahn . Jeffrey
has told Rich he would like to do=a $5000 genetic work up done for the time being. Could you coordinate with=Rich
regarding payment/next steps?
Thank you,
Lesley
Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein
Sent from my iPhone
***********
****
*****
*Milt
*****
*Mt
*********
****•***•**•
**Ai
The inform=tion contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-c=ient privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the a=dressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, di=closure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, p=ease notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], =nd
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved
3
EFTA_R1_01757294
EFTA02581208
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01919480
3p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02584961
3p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01922847
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01919480
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01922847
4p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02162282
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.