Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02582322DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02582322

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02582322
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 7:26 PM To: Melanie Spinella If you have ever experienced sexual as=ault or harassment, you know that one of the cruellest things about these acts is the way that they entangle, and attempt to contaminate, all of the best things about you. If you're sweet and friendly, you'll think that it'= your fault for accommodating the situation. If you're tough, well, you might as we=l decide that it's no big deal. If you're a gentle person, th=n he knew you were weak. If you're talented, he thought of you as an equal. 1= you're ambitious, you wanted it. If you're savvy, you knew =t was coming. If you're affectionate, you seemed like you were asking for=it all along. If you make dirty jokes or have a good time at parties, then why get moralistic? If you're smart, there's got to be some=way to rationalize this. When you are a young woman, and you believe in your=own worth and personhood and agency, it can be hard, despite the clichés that govern this situation, to understand that an older man who takes an interest in you does not necessarily share these beliefs. And, of course, young women are not the only victims of such crimes. But this is a basic and familiar pattern: a powerful man sees you, a woman who is young and who thinks she might be talented, a person who conveniently exists in a female body, and he understands that he can tie your potential to your female body, and threaten the latter, and you will never be quite as sure of the former again. Afterward, you are r=rely presented with even a single good option. Stay silent and you have acquiesced to whatever happened. Tell a friend and nothing much will be done. Come forward to an authority figure and you'll face unfair consequences: people will be uncomfortable aroun= you, perceiving ulterior motives; people will look for reasons that this happened to you, specifically; maybe you simply won't be believed. =here will be retribution—the power dynamic in these situations makes it = foregone conclusion. Men like Harvey Weinstein prey on women who are inexperienced enough that they can be penalized if they say no and implicated if they give in. In Ronan Farrow's account of Weinstein's alleged decades-long pattern of cold, angry, vicious, sexually predatory behavior, this side=of sexual victimization is particularly palpable in the actress Asia Argento's story. Argento alleges that, in 1997, she was told she wa= attending a Miramax party but was brought to a hotel room that was empty except for Weinstein. He complimented her work, and then came out of the bathroom wearing just a robe, carrying lotion. When she reluctantly agreed to give him a massage, he pulled up her skirt and forcibly performed oral sex on her as she pleaded with him to stop. "It was = nightmare," she told Farrow. Eventually, she says, she stopped prot=sting and feigned pleasure to make the encounter end faster. During the event and after, she says, she felt guilty for not physically fighting off his big naked body. Later on, she yielded to his pursuit and had consensual sex with him on multiple occasions. In the story, it is clear that Weinst=in, through this initial encounter, immediately and permanently altered Argento's life and self-perception. She told Farrow that oral sex is "ruined" =or her, and she described herself as "damaged." "I am a fucking=fool," she said. The most crushing thing, reading the account, is that Argento seems to speak with such a minimum of rancor. In fact, most of the women who have spoken up about Weinstein—a group that includes, among many others,=Mira Sorvino, Rosanna Arquette, Ashley Judd, Rose McGowan <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10=05/us/harvey-weinstein-harassment-allegations.html> Gwyneth Paltrow, and Angelina Jolie <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/10/usigwyneth-paltrow-angelina-j=lie-harvey- weinstein.html?ribbon-ad- idx=2&src=trending&module=3DRibbon&version=origin&region=Header&action=click&c=ntentCollection=Trending&pgt ype=article&_r=0> —have spoken with a tone that many women find familiar: a muted sadness, a long-kept knowledge of diminishment, a sense of undeserved yet inescapable remorse. EFTA_R1_01759683 EFTA02582322 There are stories like theirs within every indus=ry. But, on the rare occasions when such stories are publicly told, many crucial factors are often left out, or obscured: the complex dynamics that kick in during the incident; the deadening calculus that follows right after; the long, uneven, unpredictable aftermath. In Weinstein's case, these factors=are uniquely visible: he is a celebrity, many of his accusers are celebrities, and the business of Hollywood is partly conducted in public—the power matrix in the story is unusually clear. There are =Iso, already, so many women accusing Weinstein, all speaking of such similar incidents, which occurred at such similar places within their respective careers, that the comet trail of each act contributes to a collective pattern. The case has illuminated the very ordinary reality of being a youn= woman with a desire to succeed, perform, and please others, who is sexually targeted by a powerful man in her field—a man=who aims to use his position in a way that will affect her career and her selfhood whether she relents or escapes. These, too, are open secrets among women: what that moment feels like, what you think about when you consider your options, why you carry this stuff with you for so long. no good exit <https://twitter.com/yashar/status/918163984309784576> from a hotel room with Harvey Weinstein. I am not prone to self-doubt, or even to taking things personally, but the slightest brushes I've had with m=n who bait- and-switched their interest in my work and my body have left me feeling that I am, as Argento felt she was, a fucking fool. The sense of diminishment, even if it's slight or temporary, which it often is n=t, is exacerbated by the fact that men like Weinstein do not show themselves, spiritually or literally, to women above a certain point in the hierarchy of power, and they generally hide the worst of their behavior from other men. This makes for a false but often convincing narrative—you are prey only when you are not good enough, and so yo= must not have been good enough if you were prey. --94eb2c0484ba9653c7055b72a1b9-- conversation-id 27400 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1507922778 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 remote-id 758430 2 EFTA_R1_01759684 EFTA02582323

Technical Artifacts (8)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2582322
Phone2582323
Phone4309784576
Phone7922778
URLhttps://twitter.com/yashar/status/918163984309784576
URLhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/10/usigwyneth-paltrow-angelina-j=lie-harvey
URLhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/10=05/us/harvey-weinstein-harassment-allegations.html

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01430890

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02079006

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey E. emails Michael Wolff linking Boies Schiller counsel to claims that Al Gore and Bill Clinton were on an island tied to Harvey Weinstein s...

The email suggests a possible connection between a high‑profile attorney (Boies Schiller) and unverified claims that former President Al Gore and former Secretary of State Bill Clinton were present on Email from a private individual to journalist Michael Wolff references a People.com article about We Mentions "Boies" as "hisco counsel" (likely Boies Schiller law firm) representing the sender. Alle

1p
House OversightUnknown

Index of names and topics from HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020140 document

Index of names and topics from HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020140 document The passage is merely an alphabetical index of names, publications, and topics with page references. It contains no concrete allegations, transactions, dates, or relationships that could be pursued as investigative leads. While it mentions high‑profile figures (e.g., Xi Jinping, Harvey Weinstein, White House officials), there is no substantive claim linking them to misconduct, making it low‑value noise. Key insights: Lists numerous public figures and entities without context.; Includes references to White House roles, WikiLeaks, and the Whitewater affair.; Provides page numbers but no narrative or evidence.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Lesley Groff <

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.