Case File
efta-02585053DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02585053
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02585053
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
Sent:
Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:05 AM
To:
Larry Visoski
Subject:
Re: Bedford GIV crash update
order the paris charts
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Larry =isoski <
<mailto
> wrote:
Preliminary GIV Crash Report Focuse= on Flaps and Gust Lock
The NTSB's preliminary report into the crash of a Gulfstream IV during =akeoff roll at Bedford Hanscom Field
near Boston on May 31 revealed a numb=r of inconsistencies. On June 13, investigators reported that while the fl=p
handle on the jet was set to the "flaps 10" position, the flig=t data recorder indicated the flaps were set to the "flaps 20"
p=sition.
Speculation also focused on the position of the aircraft's gust loc= before takeoff. On that subject, the report
said, "The flight data r=corder (FDR) data revealed the elevator control surface position during th= taxi and takeoff was
consistent with its position if the gust lock was en=aged." The GIV's control lock will not normally allow the thrust =evers
to be advanced beyond six-percent thrust with the lock engaged. &quo=;The gust lock handle, located on the right side
of the control pedestal, =as however found in the forward (OFF) position and the elevator gust lock =atch was
disengaged," concluded investigators. The Gulfstream's F=R did not record any movement of the flight controls by the
crew before ta=eoff.
AIN spoke with a GIV pilot based in the northeast U.S. who did not wish=to be identified but offered some
insights on the aircraft. "The posi=ion of the controls recorded by the FDR was pretty consistent with where t=e flight
controls normally rest during taxiing," he said. On this bas=s, the gust lock theory would seem less plausible.
"You normally don't even start the engines with the control lo=k in place," the pilot added. He explained that
part of the Gulfstrea= takeoff procedure includes feeling the controls lighten as air moves acro=s the tail surfaces early
in the takeoff roll. "If we don't feel =hat by 60 knots or so, it's an automatic abort," he added, while =lso questioning the
takeoff speeds mentioned in the report. "At a lig=t [takeoff] weight, the V1 speed of the GIV should have been about
118 kno=s," he said, "with rotation at about 124." This prompted hi= to question why the aircraft reached a speed of 165
knots before the crew=aborted the takeoff.
EFTA_R1_01764315
EFTA02585053
http://www.ainonline.com/comment/10536 <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001j5OHloC4t-nvmCX9-
BZGrYLCnHa=ylGX3o822X_HSwEZ3itLnLyjGsohRWzFawQU6sb2Ln8e-Mh47xlWsTAE8KVq973pPlTQt4WY=I3N-
NIb4KNqGjvqppzMnOthz0uDq2Y0s8bbiw4BinPCE1lhoDXZaU2sVxnYQ_KkSI2PkUCwiku=dfkYix50QWTKgI&c=P-
oZKmpzcC2qYGr8PBy42Vim6Ky1rZKJj-f4Z-m6pjSDIbZJrMR=IA==&ch=k0t282-KwHZd8ceMsjIkRwhgWcJDM2MI3z-
zqyRVAZocXsJ_Hnmcgg=3D=>
Back to Top</=>
Timothy Boland I Senior Vice Presiden= - Western Zone Manager I Global Aerospace Inc.</=>
21650 Oxnard Street, Suite 1550, Woodland Hills, CA 91367
w) I +
<tel
(m) I www.global-
aero.com <http://www.global-aero.com/= target=>
<= href="mailto
target="_blank">-aero.com&g=;
Date: Jun 18, 2014 10:28 AM
Subject: GIV Prelim
To: "Neal Young =
<mailto
> )" <I
<mailto:
Cc:
=span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">Preliminary GI= Crash Report Focuses on Flaps and Gust
Lock
The NTSB's pre=iminary report into the crash of a Gulfstream IV during takeoff roll at Be=ford Hanscom Field
near Boston on May 31 revealed a number of inconsistenc=es. On June 13, investigators reported that while the flap
handle on the j=t was set to the "flaps 10" position, the flight data recorder i=dicated the flaps were set to the "flaps 20"
position.
Speculation also focused on the position of the aircraft's gust loc= before takeoff. On that subject, the report
said, "The flight data r=corder (FDR) data revealed the elevator control surface position during th= taxi and takeoff was
consistent with its position if the gust lock was en=aged." The GIV's control lock will not normally allow the thrust =evers
to be advanced beyond six-percent thrust with the lock engaged. &quo=;The gust lock handle, located on the right side
of the control pedestal, =as however found in the forward (OFF) position and the elevator gust lock =atch was
disengaged," concluded investigators. The Gulfstream's F=R did not record any movement of the flight controls by the
crew before ta=eoff.
2
EFTA_R1_01764316
EFTA02585054
AIN spoke with a GIV pilot based in the northeast U.S. who did not wish=to be identified but offered some
insights on the aircraft. "The posi=ion of the controls recorded by the FDR was pretty consistent with where t=e flight
controls normally rest during taxiing," he said. On this bas=s, the gust lock theory would seem less plausible.
"You normally don't even start the engines with the control lo=k in place," the pilot added. He explained that
part of the Gulfstrea= takeoff procedure includes feeling the controls lighten as air moves acro=s the tail surfaces early
in the takeoff roll. "If we don't feel =hat by 60 knots or so, it's an automatic abort," he added, while =Iso questioning the
takeoff speeds mentioned in the report. "At a lig=t (takeoff] weight, the V1 speed of the GIV should have been about
118 kno=s," he said, "with rotation at about 124." This prompted hi= to question why the aircraft reached a speed of 165
knots before the crew=aborted the takeoff.
http://www.ainonline.com/comment/10536 <http://r2O.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=OO1j5OHIoC4t-nvmCX9-
BZGrYLCnHa=ylGX3o822X_HSvvEZ3itLnLyjGsohRWzFawQU6sb2Ln8e-Mh47xlWsTAE8KVq973pPITQt4WY=I3N-
NIb4KNqGjvqppzMnOthzOuDq2YOs8bbiw4BinPCE1lhoDXZaU2sVxnYO_KkSI2PkUCwiku=dfkYix5OQVVTKgI&c=P-
oZKmpzcC2qYGr8PBy42Vim6Ky1rZKJj-f4Z-m6pjSDIbZJrMR=IA==&ch=kOt282-KwHZd8ceMsjIkRwhgWcJDM2MI3z-
zqyRVAZocXsJ_Hnmcgg=3D=>
Back to Top</=>
Timothy Boland I Senior Vice Presiden= - Western Zone Manager I Global Aerospace Inc.</=>
21650 Oxnard Street, Suite 1550, Woodland Hills, CA 91367
w) I +
<tel
(m) I www.global-
aero.com <http://www.global-aero.com/= target=>
Sent from my iPhone
</=iv>
=C24>
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, ma= be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and =s intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or =ny part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have=received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , and
3
EFTA_R1_01764317
EFTA02585055
destroy this communication =nd all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights=reserved
4
EFTA_R1_01764318
EFTA02585056
Technical Artifacts (10)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Domain
r2o.rs6.netEmail
[email protected]Phone
2585053Phone
2585054Phone
2585055Phone
2585056URL
http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001j5OHloC4t-nvmCX9URL
http://r2O.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=OO1j5OHIoC4t-nvmCX9URL
http://www.ainonline.com/comment/10536URL
http://www.global-aero.comRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02078835
0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA02097596
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02225369
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01731630
0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02327165
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Larry Visoski
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.