Case File
efta-02587613DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02587613
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02587613
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Vincenzo lozzo
Sent:
Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12:52 PM
To:
Jeffrey E.
Cc:
Joi Ito
Subject:
zero knowledge proof/SNARK
One interesting thing I stumbled upon in my reading is ZeroCash, which =s essentially a 'privacy preserving' version of
Bitcoin.
Now besides the currency itself, what's interesting is that they use a =pecific kind of zero knowledge proof (ZKP) systems
called zk-SNARK.
I'll save you the full lengthly explanation, but the reason why this is =nteresting is that:
1) ZKP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof) can be used =o proof statistically/computationally that a
user (A) knows something =ithout reveling the secret itself. eg: A can prove to user (B) that he =nows the password of a
certain system without showing the password to B. Usually that requires some kind of interaction between the users
(user B asks a round =f questions to user A, if A gets them right then it's statistically =ery unlikely that he got all of them
right without knowing the secret) =
2) zk-SNARKs are interesting because:
a) They are not interactive
b) They are 'short' and easy to prove
On top of that essentially you can prove in zero knowledge almost =nything that is 'computable'.
What this means is that if we use zk-SNARKS/similar ZKP for our currency =e can enforce arbitrary rules on how the
currency is spent ("this coin =s of type X and can only be spent with these following merchants", or =this coin can be
spent because it was not obtained illegally and the =uy payed taxes"). I'm exaggerating a bit with expressiveness, but it's
=lose.
Also this allows us to tweak the privacy vs transparency bit.
Generally speaking we have other easier options to do all these things =multi-party signatures, centralized black lists, etc
etc), but this is =nteresting.
Thoughts?
Also Jeffrey, any updates on the govt side of the house?
=?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version=.0">
<clict>
<key>conversation-idgkey>
<integer>299867</integer>
<key>date-last-viewed</key>
<integer>0</integer>
<key>date-received</key>
<integer>1409057525</integer>
<key>flags</key>
EFTA_R1_01768333
EFTA02587613
<integer>8590195713</integer>
<key>gmail-label-ids</key>
<array>
<integer>6</integer>
<integer>2</integer>
</array>
<key>remote-id</key>
<string>434491</string>
</diet>
</plist>
2
EFTA_R1_01768334
EFTA02587614
Technical Artifacts (5)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
Phone
2587613Phone
2587614Phone
9057525URL
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proofURL
http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtdRelated Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02053996
1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02662396
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Joi Ito
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.