Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02588164DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02588164

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02588164
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Vincenzo lozzo Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 1:41 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Taxes I guess the bigger question becomes: c=n the parallel between the two fields bring some insight? Because if I'm ju=t head butting against every trading desk in the world and 50years of resea=ch I'm not going to win :) So for instance monteca=lo simulations in my world is called 'fuzzing' - which essentially means th=t given an application you try to feed it with random input to see if it br=aks/crashes Two known problems of fuzzing are:&nbs=; 1) the bigger/more dimensions the input space of the applicatio= the less likely it is to find bugs 2) almost always fuzzin= ends up being a local search - so you need N fuzzers to really try and scr=tch the input space Those two reasons btw ar= why good human bug-finders are a scarce and precious resource <=iv> I guess the parallel there is tail risk - Monte Carlo sim=lations work well assuming you get the distribution right and that you stic= to stuff that is say less than say 6sigma away So=two interesting questions become: 1) can you improve on that? In m= world genetic algorithms are very useful for that for instance <=r> 2) if you can't - can you trigger events that are past t=e frontier of what montecarlo simulations can properly assess? If the answe= is yes and the cost of doing that is limited than you can make money. = Yeah I'll buy to book, I still have to finish the=money biography and Hull's book on derivatives though Sent=from my Iphone On 17/ago/2014, at 09:09, "jeff=ey E." <[email protected]</=» wrote: <mailto:[email protected]> r=sk tolerance, can be accomplished by derivatices. , arbitraged for mi= pricing, risk is never really reduced without a corresponding reward=adjustment, howevr, tax allows certain arbitrage, for ex &=bsp; gains at 20 -losses at 30 Percent . review monte car=o simulations, need resource , bank, friction charges. read fooled by=randomness. On Sun, A=g 17, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Vincenzo lozzo w=ote: Can you let me know if y=u are? I'd be helpful if we can meet up - I'm trying to look at derivatives=through my lens. EFTA_R1_01769023 EFTA02588164 What is somewhat striking is that it seems like all they=are is a programming language whose goal is to minimize risks (with the sid= effect of creating arbitrage and speculation opportunities). What I am is if you interpret trading as an optimization=problem of: given a belief(stock X will outperform the market, etc etc) max=mize returns and minimize risks. Then all derivatives are is 'functions' to=go from a risky bet to a less risky one - now you can go to riskier ones bu= that's an 'anomaly' Anyhow if this parallel somehow holds there are interest=ng questions that come up, for example: what is a Turing machine in this wo=ld? Which would be a fancy way to answer the questions: what derivatives ar= missing? Also since you can stack up multiple 'functions' (eg: combine a f=rward with an interest float-to-fixed swap to make a riskless arbitrage) th=t leads to complexity and hence to bugs But I'm not sure if this is me going insane/trying to fo=cefully fit one thing into the other or if there's actually something there=/div> One of the reason why meeting up would be useful :=) Sent from my Iphone On 17/ago/2014, at=08:47, "Jeffrey E." <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: [email protected]&g=; wrote: taxes are variable friciton On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Vincenzo lozzo < <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: So quick question for you: are taxes a trick?<=r> Here's what I mean, I think (gut feeling - no proof) that there are potentia=ly a number of arbitrage/risk-free opportunities that are not tackled by an=body because when you add in taxes you don't actually make money. Is 'hacking' taxes a strategy? It seems like all the academic texts leave th=t part for the reader which makes me think there's something there. Also I was reading a while ago that rentech was using a weird structure with=Credit Suisse (iirc) where they were taxed on their profits as if it w=s long-term capital gains instead of short-term. Sent from my (phone 2 EFTA_R1_01769024 EFTA02588165 &=bsp; please note The information cont=ined in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privi=eged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, d=sclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communicat=on in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication an= all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights re=erved please note =div>The information contained in this communication is confidential, may=be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the ad=ressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or cop=ing of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited = and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, pl=ase notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and=br> destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachme=ts. copyright -all rights reserved please note =div>The information contained in this communication is confidential, may=be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the ad=ressee. It is the property of 3 EFTA_R1_01769025 EFTA02588166 JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or cop=ing of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited =and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, pl=ase notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and=br> destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachme=ts. copyright -all rights reserved 4 EFTA_R1_01769026 EFTA02588167

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2588164
Phone2588165
Phone2588166
Phone2588167

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.