Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02595355DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02595355

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02595355
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Barnaby Marsh Sent: Sunday, November , : To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Yes I was going to talk to Martin toda=.. there are several parts. Some of the things I am figu=ing out on my end: For Joi- a first question is wh=ther this is connected with MIT (overhead) or goes another route. The latt=r seems desirable, but I hear that MIT is not too happy with this. We need=to makes sure there is not blockage. The bigger, more important issue is t=at the money enables something very unusual. I still am not convinced the =oi has all of the background details figured out. My team is working with =is people who do the background stuff, but it is not clear where the loyal=ies are here - to the Lab, or to Joi. For Martin- He has a c=rrent Templeton grant that runs through 2015 (already funded) and a second=now in the works that will begin in late 2015 and extend through 2019. The=second grant is not yet reviewed or approved. Any offer to match on the se=ond grant will help secure it. Basically, all he needs is a short letter o= statement (even from him) that says that additional donated money will au=ment and boost any of the ideas and work that he is working on in the gran=. However, it can be used any way he wishes, including new directions, suc= as special fellowships. The work is broad, so, it should be easy (as far =s you are concerned). On my end, the thing that is taking long with Martin=is just the documentation- each time we need a proposal, and he, I, and ot=ers have to put together the justification ourselves. He does not have a g=ant-writing team, like many others do. Sometimes, he uses grad students or=postdocs, but in these cases the result does not have the polish or comple=eness that is needed in a competitive process with adversarial peer review= There are reasons that I won't go into for why I don't want to cu= corners on this sort of thing, and so, it just takes longer. -B. =/div> On Sun, Nov=23, 2014 at 7:07 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]»=wrote: can we talk abou= your funding for joi and martin so that our mutual involvment gets =he best result •=A0 please note The information=contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client=privileged, may EFTA_R1_01779951 EFTA02595355 constitute inside information, and is intended only for=br>the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized =se, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this co=munication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or b= e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies the=eof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01779952 EFTA02595356

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2595355
Phone2595356

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.