Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02607446DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02607446

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02607446
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 7:24 PM To: Starr, Ken Subject: Re: Jed Rubenfeld i read turley,s piece on same subject / federa=ist papers etc. too much in the weeds. avera=e joe. not sure what he concluded =div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Starr, Ken «mailto > wrote: Wise counsel. Thx! Sent from my iPhone On Aug 22, 2018, at 1:49 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com» wrote: I think scholarly but not too much so. no one above =he law.. we began leaving a kingdom. . unlikely t= give king like powers to a president. on one above the law.=C2* I would like lunch pail joe to come away and think ,4)=A0 this guy is smart . I understood . lets see what he writes about the clintons. someone suggested that trump could shoot someone on fifth avenu= and not lose a vote. that is true , but would make little sen=e for him not to suffer an immediate consequence. the al=owed civil depo setting precedent for criminal process, is a lawyers outline I might think of dumbing it down , again , and sugge=ting that you can sue your neighbor , even if you neighbor is the presiden=. makes little sense that the you can be indicted for as=aulting him but he cannot if he assaults you. Q=A0 low bar for civil higher bar for criminal. . =at some point on your book tour I might point out how disappointed you wer= that the clinton and betty curries' trashcan story , was reopen=d . . On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:08 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@=mail.com <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: i vote yes as it makes you relevant to today rather =han merely re- reciting an old tale. :) or tail? <mailto On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Starr, Ken > wrote: Can you talk? lmpt. EFTA_R1_01799331 EFTA02607446 Sent from my iPhone On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com> wrote: thx On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Starr, Ken <mailto > wrote: Good morning! Jed teaches crim law at Yale. Outspokenly strong on the need for proc=dural fairness in campus adjudicatory proceedings. Relevant to your =riend's unhappy situation? If so, happy to make the connecti=n. Hugs, Ken Sent from my iPhone please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01799332 EFTA02607447 please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved Q=AO please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited 3 EFTA_R1_01799333 EFTA02607448 and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmai=.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved --0000000000005828b205740b14c1-- conversation-id 315122 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1534965818 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 remote-id 846975 4 EFTA_R1_01799334 EFTA02607449

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2607446
Phone2607447
Phone2607448
Phone2607449
Phone4965818

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01824206

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02610938

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

To: "Paul Cassell"

From: To: "Paul Cassell" Cc: ' "Brad Edwards" Subject: : ovemments osition on Several Pending Issues? Still Waiting for Answer Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:56:28 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul, 1. Yesterday, I provided you with the name and phone number for OPR Acting Associate Counsel, who received your December 10, 2010 letter to Mr. Ferrer, asking for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution. 2. The government will not be making initial disclosures to plaintiffs, because we do not believe Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 applies to this matter. 3. The CVRA applies to the criminal case which has been filed in district court, where an individual is deemed to be a "victim," not any civil litigation which may be initiated to enforce those claimed rights. We do not believe there is any right to discovery in this case. Moreover, we do not believe that whatever Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann Sanchez may have said to this office, or what this office said to Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann S

2p
House OversightUnknown

Palm Beach Post editorials cite Jeffrey Epstein's alleged recruitment of underage girls and his legal team’s involvement

Palm Beach Post editorials cite Jeffrey Epstein's alleged recruitment of underage girls and his legal team’s involvement The passage links high‑profile figures (Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger) to alleged sexual exploitation of minors and suggests possible obstruction via a powerful legal team. It provides specific dates, alleged actions, and mentions lawsuits, offering concrete leads for further investigation (e.g., subpoena of attorney communications, review of police search evidence). While many details are already public, the editorial context adds new angles on legal strategy and potential financial motives. Key insights: Epstein allegedly used MySpace to recruit a 13‑year‑old and other minors.; Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and former prosecutor Kenneth Starr were on Epstein’s legal team.; Jack Goldberger reportedly told a columnist the case would end without trial within two months.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01875521

0p
House OversightUnknown

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, former President Bill Clinton) that could be pursued for further investigation. It includes specific dates, subpoena details, and names of attorneys, offering concrete leads, but the claims are largely unverified and rely on the law firm’s advocacy, limiting its immediate explosiveness. Key insights: Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Roth.; Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Epstein.; Alleges misconduct by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Villafana and Sloman, including alleged self‑dealing and conflict‑of‑interest.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.