Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02608402DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02608402

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02608402
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: J <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 1:39 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: cultures swept by craziness, isnt =t the same for an individual. .. the brain sends signals base= on faulty sensors or information. . to see if the brain=is functioning. there are word tests. memory tests. etc.=C2 . why isnt conciousness the property of those thin=s. like culture is to fads etc. <=iv direltr">On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 8:09 AM Noam Chomsky rote: Cultures u=fortunately can be swept by craziness. Nazism for example. Or =he Great Awakening. We're in one of those phases now. If t=ere's a charge, it's true, in fact True. Any response is &qu=t;mansplaining," another power play, reinforcing the charge. Yo='ve seen I'm sure what happened to Lawrence. Full and comple=e response, amounts to zero. Isn't even considered. It'=s like trying to discuss rationally with religious fanatics. Noam On Sa=, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:41 AM J <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: As the stories=get wilder and the writers make the girls younger. =prostitution is a tabloid s dream , . I wondered if havi=g something out in the cyber world that let some people point =o rational arguments might allow some to defend themselves from their wive= . " how could you " etc. =A0 I have been exploring =he Al world with the cutting edge people. I remind them =f your comments re machines thinking :)/ =AO I thought that culture was the conciousness of a soci=ty. tribes were like self. . media approx =AO transmitters. . It provided constraints and rules for=some underlying interactions. It doesnt exist in a ph=sical sense but either does conciousness. wh=ch it appears to me as an evolutionary advantage and provides the br=in with rules memories. ( culture again ) . and constrai=ts. . tribes when attacked , act like a self . . =ompete like selves. etc. The world we call physical . follows=rules that we have created, most unknowingly. I =ssume language acts like an effective transmittier. . some la=guage like adrenaline. some like dopamine. . do =ome extent the hormones of the culture. ? On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 8:33 AM J <[email protected] <mailto:=eevacation@gmailcom» wrot=: Im considering su=mitting this to the oped of the wash post id like your thoughts =A0 Sweetheart deal!" So goes the attack on the reso=ution of the more than a decade ago federal investigation involving our cl=ent Jeffrey Epstein. The attack is profoundly misplaced, supported n=ither by the law nor the facts. Nor is it supported by the structure of ou= constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an EFTA_R1_01800974 EFTA02608402 ext=emely aggressive federal intrusion into what would typically be considered=a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. The=C2 offense investigated — at its core, sexual fav=rs for hire — has long been treated as a matter entruste= to laws of the several States, not the federal government. The cond=ct — for which Jeffrey took full responsibilit= — was a classic state offense and was treated exactly that w=y by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County. Nevertheless, =A0without a request from the state prosecutors, the federal governmen= intervened. For their own opportunistic reasons, many are now criti=izing the federal decision-makers at the time, including now-Secretary of =abor Alex Acosta (then-United States Attorney in south Florida), for not g=ing far enough. =he critics are wrong on the facts and the law. They also ignore a fact goi=g to the heart of fundamental fairness: In the decade since pay=ng his debt to society, Jeffrey Epstein has led a life characterized by re=ponsible citizenship, numerous acts of generosity and good deeds. Here are the true key fact=: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no p=ior criminal history whatsoever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounted=C2 to solicitation of prostitution. That conduct was wro=g and a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violen=e, alcohol, drugs or the like were involved, some of the women he paid =A0were under the age of 18. Those facts were carefully assessed=by experienced state sex crime prosecutors who aggressively enforce state =riminal laws. No one turned a blind eye to potential offenses to the=public order. To the contrary, the Palm Beach State Attorney's O=fice conducted an extensive fifteen-month investigation, led by the chief =f the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by the stat= grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution. =AO During that intense investigation, the state prosecutors exten=ively gathered and analyzed the evidence, met face-to-face with many =f the asserted victims, considered their credibility — or lack the=eof — and considered the extent of exculpatory evidence, incl=ding sworn testimony from many that they lied about being eighte=n years old to be allowed into Mr. Epstein's home. After mon=hs of negotiations, the state prosecutors believed they had reached a reas=ned resolution of the matter that vindicated the public interest —=a resolution entirely consistent with that of cases involving other simila=ly-situated defendants. The system worked as it should have. </=pan> Then, in came the fe=s. The United States Attorney's Office extensively and aggressiv=ly investigated whether Mr. Epstein had engaged in a commercial human traf=icking ring, targeted minors, or used the internet or traveled inters=ate in the process. But that's not what this was a=d that's not what happened. That is precisely why the f=deral authorities' ultimate decision to defer prosecution to =he state was the right one. However, the federally-demanded resolution was not wit=out conditions. The federal prosecutors insisted on various unorthodo= requirements that Mr. Epstein's experienced defense team had neve= seen imposed on any defendant anywhere. Under the federally-forced deal, =effrey was required to request that the state prosecutors demand the =mposition of a thirty-month sentence that included both jail tim= and the strictest conditions of probation: lifetime sex-offender reg=stration. Those draconian measures were far more than warranted by th= state grand jury's indictment and would not have otherwise b=en required under the previously agreed-upon state disposition. As part of=this highly unusual deal, the government required Jeffrey to pay=for a highly experienced group of attorneys to bring claims agai=st him on behalf of a government list of asserted victims. Jeffrey was req=ired to waive 2 EFTA_R1_01800975 EFTA02608403 the right to challenge those claims without being provided t=e asserted victim's identities by the government until after he wa= incarcerated. Importantly, the feds' decision to decline prosec=tion in deference to the state in exchange for these extraordina=y requirements was reviewed and approved at the multiple levels of th= U.S. Department of Justice. Jeffrey took full responsibility, =omplied with the feds' demands, served his sentence, and in t=e process was treated exactly the same (including his time served) =A0as any other state-incarcerated individuals. His conduct while in =ustody was exemplary, and so characterized by the state custodial authorit=es. Jeffrey Epstein has paid his debt to society. The=challenges to his Agreement with the Government must also be understo=d as challenges to the millions Mr. Epstein paid to the asserted victims a=d their lawyers pursuant to that agreement. Amongst the beneficiaries=of the Epstein-Federal Government Agreement were the many victims who coll=ctively received many millions as a result of the conditions imposed on Mr= Epstein that prevented him from meaningfully contesting civil liability =E2 moneys that would be at issue if requests to invalidate the agree=ent were granted. Our nation faces vitally important challenges, =any involving the treatment of women and basic human dignity. Voices=are rightly being raised speaking truth to power, especially about women i= the workplace. But Jeffrey's offenses of yesteryear, which =ere entirely outside of the workplace, have long since been redressed by t=e criminal justice system. He fully and faithfully has per=ormed every promise and obligation required of him by state and feder=l authorities. In the spirit of the bedrock American belief in secon= chances and fundamental fairness, that chapter in Jeffrey's otherwise=productive and charitable life should be allowed to close once a=d for all. =u> please note =/div>-- =lease note The information contained in this communication is c=nfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside in=ormation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the =roperty of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this co=munication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawf.l. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us i=mediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy th=s communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copy=ight -all rights reserved please note 3 EFTA_R1_01800976 EFTA02608404 T=e information contained in this communication is confidential, may be a=torney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is int=nded only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE communication or any pa=t thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have recei=ed this communication in error, please notify us immediately by retu=n e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication an= all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights r=served =please note The information contained in this communication is =onfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside i=formation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the=property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this c=mmunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlaw=ul. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy t=is communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. cop=right -all rights reserved --0000000000000acd1c057e294ca4-- conversation-id 317580 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1546090717 flags 8590195713 remote-id 886263 4 EFTA_R1_01800977 EFTA02608405

Technical Artifacts (7)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2608402
Phone2608403
Phone2608404
Phone2608405
Phone6090717

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.