Case File
efta-02614792DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02614792
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02614792
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
Ken Starr
Sent:
Friday, November 23, 2018 4:56 PM
To:
Subject:
Re:
I know this is a pesky theological issue, o=e that I struggle with. Let's talk it over with Steve. =hurch in New York it is.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 23,=2018, at 9:05 AM, J <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
as usual , very clever , he was great. however t=e double negative of-not bad to those that dont.. is not the
sa=e as -only good to those that do. :) when you are in new york n=xt we should sit with Bannon , I told him he can
learn alot fro= you. and as you are probably already aware he doesnt miss a su=day in church .
On=Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 9:00 AM Ken Starr
> wrote:
Again, fair point. But as Billy Gra=am was wont to say, I don't pretend to know the mind of God. S= the
great preacher for one would not agree with the proposition of unhappy=consequences automatically flowing to those
who did not believe.
<=r>
Sent from my iPhone</=iv>
On Nov 23, 2018, at 8:36 AM, J <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote:
<=div>
. Romans 10:13, "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Say,
"Father in Heaven, I believe that Jesus died for my sins." And=God will impart eternal life to your spirit... sounds like
forced spe=ch to me
On=Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 8:31 AM Ken Starr
<mailtol
la
wrote:
<=div>
Great point! At a=basic level, the acceptance of Christ must be voluntary. It*=99s an
invitation. No forced acknowledgments, conversions etc., as in=the bad old days. Rather, the invitation is extended,
warmly and lovi=gly.
EFTA_R1_01813420
EFTA02614792
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 23, 2018, at 7:29=AM,1 <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]» wrote:
<=iv dir="ltr">great seeing you, I ,m having trouble distinguis=ing between
your baker case and Jesus. . havi=g to accept christ seems to me in your words " forced&nbs=; speech" . Laying out
behaviors to follow , seems legit. =nbsp; forcing ackowledgment of a belief. seems like tell the baker no= only should he
make the cake, but he should say I believe?
please note
Th= information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be att=rney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intend=d only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Una=thorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part th=reof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received th=s
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-ma=l or by e-mail to <mailto:[email protected]>
= please note
The information contained in this communication is
=onfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside in=ormation, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the p=operty of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
comm=nication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful.=If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immed=ately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]
<mailto:jeevacation@gma=l.com> , and
destroy this com=unication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved
<=iv dir="ltr">
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may b= attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is i=tended only for
2
EFTA_R1_01813421
EFTA02614793
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEEUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any pa=t thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have receiv=d this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return=e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> , and
destroy this communication and all c=pies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved<=r>
3
EFTA_R1_01813422
EFTA02614794
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02551734
3p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02546050
1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025
Alleged quid‑pro‑quo between Alex Acosta and Jeffrey Epstein’s defense team, implicating Kirkland lawyers and senior officials
The passage links a sitting cabinet member (Alex Acosta) to a lenient plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein and suggests possible career‑advancing favors from powerful law firm partners (Kirkland & Ellis) and Acosta, then U.S. Attorney, approved a 13‑month sentence for Epstein despite serious sex‑trafficking The email alleges Acosta negotiated the plea deal with Kirkland lawyer Jay Lefkowitz, a former col
4p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02601988
3p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02551568
2p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01412453
0p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.