Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02622881DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02622881

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02622881
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 10:40 PM To: paul krassner Subject: Re: deja' vu' by pk great On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:48 PM, paul krassner < <mailto > wrote: Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit =/b> I shall i=entify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator. It is also relevant that I have long nurtured a keen interest in psycho-history, the process by which a nation's directi=n is interpreted as an extension of the psychological makeup of those individual= who govern it. =C2 Without going into specific detail, let me s=mply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part of a conversation among Judge=E2 now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Sena=or Alan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then 13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Jud=e Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he would be=confirmed. =AO The conversation I happened to hear had to do w=th those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by the members of the committee, =oth Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was a= appropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomas would then have had no practical choice=but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in a jocular fashi=n, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill =99s allegations. =AO Senator Simpson was saying, "Y'=now, Clarence, I've seen some pretty raunchy porno movies in my time, but I never did see one where = lady was having sex with an animal." "=11 never forget it," Judge Thomas replied in his riveting sonorous tone. "They were in a barn. Except that the inside of the =arn was like a theater." =AO Senator Hatch interjected, "Summe= stock, eh? No pun intended" =AO "There was a stage at one end, =80 Judge Thomas continued his description, "and the stage was facing rows and rows of wooden fold=ng chairs. There were haystacks piled up on the stage, and in front of the haystacks t=ere was a beautiful, buxom, blond woman—and a donkey. Well, the woman b=gan disrobing and she started stroking the donkey to arousal." =C2 "Doesn't sound at all sleazy to me," Senator=Simpson said. =C2 "Actually, it had Beethoven piano so=atas playing in the background," Judge Thomas said. "Well, when the woman was f=lly disrobed and the donkey was fully aroused, they began copulating, right there in front o= those haystacks on the stage of that barn. Slow and sensual. Then bumping a=d grinding away, accompanied by EFTA_R1_01831311 EFTA02622881 passionate moans and wild braying. You =99ve never seen a sight like this, I promise. And then the camera panned slowly toward=the audience ... and the audience consisted entirely of donkeys. =90 =C2 The Senate office shook with raucous laughter, especiall= that of Judge Thomas. His booming guffaws rang like huge gongs in a church belfry. And, I must admit, I had to suppress my own laughter. I had been totally caught by surprise, but I appreciated getting the insight. Homo sap=ens is, in reality, the only species that has a need for pornography.=/u> =C2 When the group's laughter finally began to simmer down, Senator Hatch said, "I suppose that movie was one of the demands of=the animal rights people." =AO "That's correct, =80 Senator Simpson added. "Saving animals' lives is no longer enough. They need culture."=/p> =1 felt like I was imprisoned in the boys' locker room, but I was getting ready to force myself to leave anyway, and it would have ended right there for me if the subject matter hadn't returned to Anita H=II. =C2 "I'm glad nobody considered calling h=r to testify against me, even for a closed-door session," Judg= Thomas said. "But you fellas will really love this. Anita Hill was = very opinionated young lady. Actually, she and I once had an extremely an=mated discussion on the decriminalization of abortion. Can you imagine what the Democrats would've done with that?=E2 =C2 And that was the precise instant I made the decisi=n to leak Professor Hill's statement to the press. Although I have constantly=been sexually hassled, I have never really been harassed in the legal sense of the word. However, I have had an abortion, and I was totally outraged by the blatant hypocrisy I'd o=erheard. I had never leaked a document before, but my anger overshadowed my fear.</=> =AO I chose Nina Totenberg because I had come to trust her reporting about the Supreme Court on National Public Radio. I honestly had =o idea what leaking the affidavit would accomplish. I certainly did not envis=on that it would literally embarrass the Senate into delaying the vote until public hearings were held, though that probably was my secret desire. =AO But Judge Thomas testified under oath that he had never discussed the subject of abortion. However= in response to a question by Senator Hank Brown, Professor Hill testified that=she had disagreed with Judge Thomas in a discussion about Roe v. Wade. U=fortunately, then-Senator Joseph Biden quickly interrupted her. =C2 'That is not the subject of these he=rings," he said. =AO Personally, I feel quite disappoint=d about that particular aspect of the testimony, but I have not the slightest regret over leaking A=ita Hill's affidavit, and I would gladly do it all over again. =C2 I certainly set a higher moral standard for myself than did the staffer for Senator John Danforth who wrote Judge Thomas's stat=ment that began, "Nobody helped me with this." plea=e note 2 EFTA_R1_01831312 EFTA02622882 The information contained in this communication is confi=ential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside inform=tion, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the prop=rty of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this commun=cation or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. =f you have received this communication in error, please notify us immed=ately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gm=il.com>, and destroy this c=mmunication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyrigh= -all rights reserved --00000000000022cb4705762cf90c-- conversation-id 327956 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1537310413 flags 8590195713 remote-id 854559 3 EFTA_R1_01831313 EFTA02622883

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2622881
Phone2622882
Phone2622883
Phone7310413

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged 1991 Senate Conversation Between Clarence Thomas, Orrin Hatch, and Alan Simpson Describing Explicit Animal Scene

The passage presents a sensational, unverified anecdote about a private conversation involving high‑profile officials. It lacks corroborating evidence, dates, or concrete leads (no documents, recordin Claims a 1991 informal meeting where Thomas, Hatch, and Simpson discussed Anita Hill allegations in Alleged decision by an unnamed female aide to leak Anita Hill’s affidavit to NPR’s Nina Totenberg.

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged 1991 Conversation Between Clarence Thomas, Orrin Hatch, and Alan Simpson About Anita Hill Allegations

The passage claims a private, unrecorded conversation in 1991 where senior Republican officials allegedly acknowledged the truth of Anita Hill's allegations. It provides no verifiable evidence, dates, Alleged informal meeting on Oct. 5, 1991, one week after Senate Judiciary Committee vote on Thomas. Participants: Clarence Thomas (future Justice), Sen. Orrin Hatch, Sen. Alan Simpson. Claimed discus

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged British Intelligence (Tavistock) and LaRouche Network Ties to 1950s Pornography and 1970s Anti‑Nuclear Protest Briefings

Alleged British Intelligence (Tavistock) and LaRouche Network Ties to 1950s Pornography and 1970s Anti‑Nuclear Protest Briefings The passage links a historic British intelligence institute (Tavistock) to U.S. political activist Lyndon LaRouche’s private intelligence network and claims they briefed state police on a 1970s anti‑nuclear protest. It provides specific names and a concrete event, offering a potential investigative angle (e.g., archival search for Tavistock‑related projects, LaRouche intelligence files, police briefing records). However, the claims are vague, lack dates, documents, or transaction details, and the Tavistock‑pornography connection is a long‑standing conspiracy trope, reducing novelty and verifiability. Key insights: Paul Krassner allegedly recruited by the Tavistock Institute in the early 1950s for pornographic satire.; Lyndon LaRouche’s private intelligence network reportedly briefed a state police lieutenant before a 1970s Seabrook nuclear plant protest.; The U.S. Labor Party’s newsletter was allegedly subscribed to by police departments nationwide.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged British Intelligence (Tavistock) and LaRouche Network Ties to 1950s Pornography and 1970s Anti‑Nuclear Protest Briefings

The passage links a historic British intelligence institute (Tavistock) to U.S. political activist Lyndon LaRouche’s private intelligence network and claims they briefed state police on a 1970s anti‑n Paul Krassner allegedly recruited by the Tavistock Institute in the early 1950s for pornographic sat Lyndon LaRouche’s private intelligence network reportedly briefed a state police lieutenant before

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: paul krassner

2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02630991

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.