Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02623089DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02623089

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02623089
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Ken Starr <Ip l Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 11:25 AM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Thank you! Very wise. It of cou=se goes against my naturally sunny disposition, so I'll be fighting=a bit. Doing West Coast radio Friday nite. Next time! <=div> Safe travels.© (There I go again!). Hugs, Ken Sent from my iPhone On Sep 11, 2018, at 7:09 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: 1. good work on i=terviews , -- my take is-i would tone down the affable. &n=sp; you are pronouncing judgment . smiling , trying=to be liked conflicts with the gravity. im sure your pr=people are better than i am at this. . it is a time when peopl= are looking for authority, not friends. darker tie ,&nb=p; imagine you are talking to a defendant telling him/her its jail ti=e. smiling wont be welcomed. 2 im back f=i in new york if you have time fri night. or early sat. &n=sp; no worry if not. &n=sp; please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, m=y constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of tre addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure o= copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibite= and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in erro=, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], a=d destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all at=achments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_01831704 EFTA02623089

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02616307

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01812018

3p
OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01814412

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.