Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02625015DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02625015

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02625015
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Lawrence Krauss <-> on behalf of Lawrence Krauss Sent: Monday, September 3, 2018 6:30 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: lawsuit in Australia I =gree that the appeal presentation is very important.. and I appreciate =our grounding me on a variety of issues here, and that my assumptions =n many cases were completely wrong. The conciliation process is =ot a hearing though, and I have no idea at this point what they will =sk. They are essentially charged, as far as I can see, with the =ask of looking at the Dean's letter and my appeal letter, and =eeing if they can suggest any action that would satisfy both parties.. =nbsp;They are not there to take evidence or even adjudicate the truth. =nbsp;l think they are there to look at both letters and see which they =hink is more convincing, and on the basis of both what action moving =orward is most appropriate. I hope to learn more about =his as this proceeds. In any case, I did what was on my homework for this =orning,.. I spent 40 min drafting a possible letter to solicitors in =ustralia. If you are not onboard for that.. namely if you have =hanged your mind compared to what you proposed and agreed to last week, = will drop that.. But I wanted to draft something to see what that =ight look like and get feedback about the letter.. LM K Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics =epartment Arizona State University, P.O. Box =71404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: Assistant (Jessica): I twitter.comilkraussl I www.lawrencemkrauss.com On Sep 3, 2018, at 11:19 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: i am aware , what i am trying to =oint out to you is that your instincts have not served you well =TALL ll you need to stop, think =nd correct. you have been consistant re the =llegations , and your presentation , which you believed =ntil the very last day would exonerate =ou. obvious to most if not all that it =oudl not happen. the presentatio of your appeal =etter is in and of itself not a winner, it will be =our presentation. and the ability to overcome the skeptiscims re =our version of events. these are emotional =rguments not factual , but i have said =hat for almost a year. this is super =mportant for the rest of your life.. the appeal is the only =hing and if you are relying on what you have prepared to =ate the odds are not in your =avor. I give you credit for persistance , but =ou need to take a cold look at the results so far. On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Lawrence Krauss =span dir="ltr" class="">< <mailto » wrote: I =efer you to this email exchange last week, after you asked me to =nitiate this process.. EFTA_R1_01836099 EFTA02625015 Lawrence M. =rauss Professor School of Earth & Space =xploration and Physics Department Arizona State =niversity, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: I Assistant (Jessica): - <mailto -> =nbsp; I twitter.comAkrauss1 I www.lawrencemkrauss.com Begin forwarded message: From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: lawsuit in =ustralia Date: August 28, 2018 at 10:55:18 AM =DT To: Lawrence Krauss < Yes On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 n 1:49 PM Lawrence Krauss < <mailto > wrote: Hi.. I have been thinking about lawsuit in Australia =perhaps the first of several ones we will be involved in). In =ustralia all one has to do is show she lied about facts in a public =ocument.. even if she was just repeating false facts from someone else =o use to impugn me. The three unassailable facts are: 1. There is no photo of =e touching anyone's breast. 2. There =as no claim of me doing anything similar regarding the woman at =WRU 3. 1 have never threatened anyone with =itigation to cause them to remove any blog. There are of course =ther lies, but I think if we focus on these lies in her effort to =mpugn me that we have a solid case. I would like to begin the =rocess of exploring counsel in Australia. Are you on board? Note =hat none of this is retaliation against her claim at ASU, but against =er public claims associated with this. LM K Lawrence M. =rauss 2 EFTA_R1_01836100 EFTA02625016 <mailto Professor School of Earth & Space =xploration and Physics Department Arizona State =niversity, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: Assistant (Jessica): > =nbsp; I twitter.comilkrauss1 I www.lawrencemkrauss.com please note The information contained in this =ommunication is confidential, may be attorney-client =rivileged, may constitute inside information, and is =ntended only for the use of the addressee. It is the =roperty of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure =r copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have =eceived this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this =ommunication and all copies thereof, including all =ttachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this =ommunication is confidential, may be attorney-client =rivileged, may constitute inside information, and is =ntended only for the use of the addressee. It is the =roperty of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure =r copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have =eceived this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this =ommunication and all copies thereof, including all =ttachments. copyright -all rights reserved 3 EFTA_R1_01836101 EFTA02625017

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.lawrencemkrauss.com
Phone2625015
Phone2625016
Phone2625017
Phone287-1404

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.