Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02629257DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02629257

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02629257
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Ken Starr Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 11:31 AM To: Subject: Re: Thank you. When the going gets tough.=. Sent from my iPhone O= Feb 7, 2019, at 6:28 AM,1 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I am happy to follow suggestions. I do=not question your friendship . I do want to make sure that this crazi=ess does not drag you into a mess, . I would guess that a=ter mueller report, and what i understand the southern district is up to.&n=sp; I would think that your opinions would be highly valued with rega=d trump. I fear backlash for you. On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 a= 7:20 AM Ken Starr > wrote: Have we considered seeking a meeting with S=nator Sasse? All he can do is say no. Either way, then do an Op=d. If the idea has merit, my proposed threesome f=r the delegation: Kathy, Alan, Ken. Sent from my i=hone On Feb 7, 2019, at 4:21 AM, 1 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: is it time to pub=ish the op ed? under whose name, I think we might save ke= , for later? maybe a follow up? but i assume=nbsp; that ken will be shortly writing on trump and his legal trevails. -sh=uld we suggest that if the facts as reported were true we could under=tand the scrutiny and outrage but they are wildly inaccurate. =and the deal was ... not a sweetheart please note The inf=rmation contained in this communication isis it time EFTA_R1_01847475 EFTA02629257 confidential, may b= attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is i=tended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEEUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any pa=t thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have receiv=d this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return=e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all c=pies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved<=r> &=bsp; please note The information cont=ined in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privi=eged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the=use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, dis=losure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly p=ohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication=in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to <= href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">jeevacation@gmail.=om, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, includ=ng all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01847476 EFTA02629258

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2629257
Phone2629258

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01824206

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02610938

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

To: "Paul Cassell"

From: To: "Paul Cassell" Cc: ' "Brad Edwards" Subject: : ovemments osition on Several Pending Issues? Still Waiting for Answer Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:56:28 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul, 1. Yesterday, I provided you with the name and phone number for OPR Acting Associate Counsel, who received your December 10, 2010 letter to Mr. Ferrer, asking for an investigation of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution. 2. The government will not be making initial disclosures to plaintiffs, because we do not believe Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 applies to this matter. 3. The CVRA applies to the criminal case which has been filed in district court, where an individual is deemed to be a "victim," not any civil litigation which may be initiated to enforce those claimed rights. We do not believe there is any right to discovery in this case. Moreover, we do not believe that whatever Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann Sanchez may have said to this office, or what this office said to Kenneth Starr or Lilly Ann S

2p
House OversightUnknown

Palm Beach Post editorials cite Jeffrey Epstein's alleged recruitment of underage girls and his legal team’s involvement

Palm Beach Post editorials cite Jeffrey Epstein's alleged recruitment of underage girls and his legal team’s involvement The passage links high‑profile figures (Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger) to alleged sexual exploitation of minors and suggests possible obstruction via a powerful legal team. It provides specific dates, alleged actions, and mentions lawsuits, offering concrete leads for further investigation (e.g., subpoena of attorney communications, review of police search evidence). While many details are already public, the editorial context adds new angles on legal strategy and potential financial motives. Key insights: Epstein allegedly used MySpace to recruit a 13‑year‑old and other minors.; Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and former prosecutor Kenneth Starr were on Epstein’s legal team.; Jack Goldberger reportedly told a columnist the case would end without trial within two months.

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01875521

0p
House OversightUnknown

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, former President Bill Clinton) that could be pursued for further investigation. It includes specific dates, subpoena details, and names of attorneys, offering concrete leads, but the claims are largely unverified and rely on the law firm’s advocacy, limiting its immediate explosiveness. Key insights: Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Roth.; Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Epstein.; Alleges misconduct by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Villafana and Sloman, including alleged self‑dealing and conflict‑of‑interest.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.