Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02632676DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02632676

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02632676
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: 1 <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 9:44 PM To: David Schoen https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/=4/opinion/lettersneffrey-epstein.html <https://www.nytimes.com/2019/0404/opinion/letters/jeffrey-epstein.html> =C2 please note The information contained in t=is communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, ma= constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of =he addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure=or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohib=ted and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in =rror, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]=m, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, incluthng all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved </=iv> --0000000000000ce32d05834ba7c4-- conversation-id 335246 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1551735831 flags 8590195713 remote-id 908336 1 EFTA_R1_01854324 EFTA02632676

Related Documents (6)

House OversightPolice ReportNov 11, 2025

Academic footnotes on federal vs. state jurisdiction in sexual assault and police misconduct cases

The passage consists of scholarly citations and general discussion of legal frameworks without naming specific individuals, transactions, or actionable allegations. It offers minimal investigative val Discusses federalism-based enforcement redundancy in crimes like sexual assault. References the Violence Against Women Act and its lack of federal criminal offenses. Notes federal statutes (e.g., 18

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Law review article proposes extensive amendments to Federal Criminal Rules to implement Crime Victims' Rights Act

The document outlines policy proposals for rule changes but contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving specific powerful actors. It is a scholarly discussion, offering Identifies gaps in current Federal Rules where victims are barely mentioned. Cites legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and related statutes. Proposes specific rule amendments

103p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01974883

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein email to attorney David Schoen referencing Justice Breyer and U.S. Attorney's office

The passage is a routine attorney‑client email from Jeffrey Epstein to his lawyer, containing vague comments about Justice Breyer’s views on sentencing and a generic complaint about the U.S. Attorney’ Email sent by Jeffrey Epstein on Feb 22, 2010 to attorney David Schoen. Mentions a recent panel in DC where Epstein sat next to Justice Stephen Breyer. Comments that Justice Breyer believes the sente

1p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

FBI notified Epstein victims of CVRA rights before non‑prosecution agreement, suggesting DOJ misapplied victim‑rights statutes

The passage reveals that the FBI sent victim‑rights notices to Epstein’s alleged victims months before a non‑prosecution deal, implying the agency assumed CVRA applicability and later reversed its pos FBI sent a notice to Jane Doe #1 on June 7, 2007, stating her rights under the CVRA. The notice preceded the non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein by over three months. The Department of Jus

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.