EFTA02633736

From: 1 <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 3:47 AM To: Kathy Ruemmler why isnt kirkland and ellis defending this npa in front of=marra, it is their agreement that i followed.? pled =AO, registered and paid money. do they have an obligati=n to defend it. ? =C2 please note The informat=on contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-cli=nt privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only =or the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthoriz=d use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof =s strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this return e-mail o= by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies =hereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved </=iv> --00000000000033698005829bad45-- conversation-id 336578 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1550980020 flags 8590195713 remote-id 903524 EFTA_R1_01857599 EFTA02633736