EFTA02634196

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019

SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019 SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Contents Public Corruption 2 Epstein 2 General Crimes 14 Sprecher 14 Violent and Organized Crime 20 Walter 20 Civil Division 22 NYCHA 22 Securities and Commodities Fraud 24 Margulies 24 Sharma and Farkas 26 Matters of Interest 28 Obama-era counsel Greg Craig's trial postponed; new jury to be selected 28 Epstein Saga Puts Spotlight on Crime Victim's Rights Act 30 Donziger Faces Criminal Contempt Prosecution Team at Seward & Kissel 34 Jail Where Epstein Died Has Record of Security Blunders 36 2nd Circuit's Decision Could Embolden Federal Anti-Corruption Prosecutors 38 1 EFTA00094388 SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Public Corruption Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me When I Was 15 NYT By [REDACTED - Survivor] 8/14/19 The first time I stepped into Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side in the fall of 2001, I noticed his security cameras. They w

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS

From: Cc: Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:15:07 +0000 Attachments: 2019 8-14.pdf SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 EFTA00094360 Contents Public Corruption Epstein General Crimes Sprecher Violent and Organized Crime Walter Civil Division NYCHA Securities and Commodities Fraud Margulies Sharma and Farkas Matters of Interest Obama-era counsel Greg Craig's trial postponed; new jiLD, to be selected Epstein Saga Puts Spotlight on Crime Victim's Rights Act Donziger Faces Criminal Contempt Prosecution Team at Seward & Kissel Jail Where Epstein Died Has Record of Security Blunders 2nd Circuit's Decision Could Embolden Federal Anti-Corruption Prosecutors Public Corruption Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me When I Was 15 NYT By [REDACTED - Survivor] 8/14/19 The first time I stepped into Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side in the fall of 2001, I noticed his security cameras.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO VICTIMS' MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement, and states: I. THE MOTION TO UNSEAL SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT HAS NEVER BEEN FILED UNDER SEAL IN THIS COURT. Petitioners have filed their motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement, claiming that no good cause exists for sealing it. As an initial matter, the motion should be denied because the non-prosecution agreement entered into between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by the United States, either under seal or otherwise. On August 14, 2008, this Court held a telephonic hearing to discuss petitioners' r

Case 09-34791-RBR