Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02634524DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02634524

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02634524
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: 1 <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 1:03 PM To: Michael Wolff Subject: Re: Privileged Allowing Julie brown to interview me? On S=t, Apr 6, 2019 at 8:59 AM Michael Wolff wrote: Broken record here: =ontrition has to be coordinated with all other aspects of the response. An= this sounds like an apology that's not an apology which would like ma=e matters worse. The problem is that people don't want you to apologiz= for frequenting prostitutes, they want you to apologize for being a pedop=ile and for sex trafficking--and they don't want you to apologize for =hat, they want you to be crucified for that. A simple apology doesn't =flange the other side's narrative; I actually think it propels it. A pr=per apology is not an apology, it's a ritual act of public mortificati=n and confession. You have to be naked and through yourself on the mercy o= the media. To say the very least, the stage has to be set for this. =/div> =n Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 5:31 AM J <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected].» wrote: I agree that an= push back seems to leads to trouble- so- what about some act of con=rition ( brad ) . with an apology alongside clearly setting the facts stra=ght.! No pedohile no traffficking . And then cvra girls drop =heir case . I.e. I establish a mental health center for sex w=rkers . [REDACTED]e center ? please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may b= attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is =ntended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE=br>Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any=part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have re=eived this communication in error, please notify us immediately by r=turn e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication a=d all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights =eserved =AO please note The information contained in this=communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, mayconstitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the=addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or=copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibite= and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in err=r, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]<=a>, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including=all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved --00000000000094922b0585dc37f1-- conversation-id 337368 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1554555755 flags 8590195713 remote-id 920126 EFTA_R1_01859453 EFTA02634524

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2634524
Phone4555755

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.