EFTA02640043

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2018 6:23 PM To: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: My view of the situation mostly right. . no oversight of fe=s. paid. there is this law in arizona called elderly abuse. =AO that they will focus on. IT is awful. . =C2 Harry has overstepped his authority and continues to hold on to his =isplaced ideas. I think there is no alternative but for =oam to write a letter to max firm and its executrive commitee laying=out his shock at max behavior.. money paid to harry children = no documentation. the only payments should be to =oam . and noam alone, if he wants to pay it to somenone else h= can. Harry is willing to fight. and w=ll. noam needs to decide to meet him. or litgate. On Sat, Jul 7, 2018=at 2:01 PM, Valeria Chomsky < wrote: The thr=e children believe that all Noam's money, not only from the marital Tr=st, but also from the IRAs belongs to them, because it was made when Noam =as married to their mother. >>> But n=t only from the time their marriage lasted, because after Noam and his sec=nd wife had been married, Harry once flew from California to complain that=royalties even of a new book that Noam wrote after being married to his se=ond wife should NOT come to the second wife). And the book publicati=n was delayed and all sorts of legal difficulties and pressure from Max to=have the book only under Noam's name -- with Deborah's endorsement= until Gene Landy stood up in the case. Therefore= in their minds, all the money should be inherited by them. In the will that Max proposed, the second wife would=receive $25,000, and even the remaining money from bank accounts should go=to the Noam Chomsky Revocable Trust. At the time the bank account wa= being used only as an account for making payments. So it had only the exa=t amount for payments. At the time, before Noam a=d his second wife sold the apartment in Cambridge (that was bought after N=am and his second wife had been married -- btw that it was not allowed by =ax to be bought jointly in Noam's and his second wife's name) and =11 the tangible assets including, sheets, pillowcases, glasses, silverware= books, objects, rugs, furniture and all its content, as Max wrote, would =lso go to the NCRT. Therefore, including things that Noam and his se=ond wife had acquired together. The document stat=d that then all tangible assets would be sold and the money would be rever=ed to the NC Revocable Trust, that would have become at that point irrevoc=ble. The NC Revocable Trust has the three children as its beneficiaries. =iv> Harry was nominated trustee of the marital trust.=C2 He now controls the other trustee, Max. The=IRA has been the main source of income and Noam's children want it to =e the only source of income, preserving the marital trust intact for themselves. EFTA_R1_01872847 EFTA02640043 After Noam realized that the gifts to=his children and payments of their expenses from the IRA, plus our own exp=nses were depleting the IRA in taxes that are being paid also from the IRA= he stopped the gifts to 10 family members. =div>The idea is that Noam uses only the IRA for all expenses and taxes, si=ce Noam designated one of the IRAs as the inheritance to his second wife.=C2 Interestingly they want to make sure that there are no current gifts=to the second wife. Maybe because they want to be able to contest th= will, saying that they -- Noam's children -- were excluded from Noam&=39;s inheritance. The only reason I can see why they would care if t=ere are gifts being made to the second wife is that this would diminish th=ir portion in the inheritance that they can claim from the IRA. Othe=wise, what difference would it make if the second wife receives it n=w or later? And a possible claim for the IRA is the same reason to c=ntrol our expenses, requesting financial information. =div>The main purpose of all this is to collect Noam's and his second w=fe's financial information to construct their own stories/cases. =Therefore, if even Noam provides all the financial information, they won&#=93 release more money from the marital trust than what they have already =ecided, and this, only if the conditions they established, such as signing=releases for them for their wrongdoing will be satisfied. The whole thing is about having control of our lives a=d see how much we spend in the market and be able to denounce that we are =pending too much here or there and that we are not living according to the="family's standards" and that they have to intervene. =C2 Crazy! Valeria PS: Please correct me if I am wro=g. Forwarded message From: jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.=om» Date: Sat, J=I 7, 2018 at 9:07 AM Subject: Fwd: Marital Trusts To: Noam Chomsky >>> >, Valeria Chomsky the gifts to third parties are a refence to valeria AG=IN!!! . he should not be allowed to slip awa= . and abdicate his past or present responsibilites. =AO you need to send a strong response. . =AO You are trustee and have been for many years. I believe tha= trying to avoid fufilling those responsiblites by delay , and repeated qu=stions re gifts , which we have answered a numner of times is =nacceptable.. there is over 2 million dollars in the trust . so pre=ending that the concern is for my future , is clearly untrue. =aving the trust income payouts being less than 10k per year as you a=d harry have paid expenses to which i was never consulted is outrageious ,= Forwarded messa e From: Richard Kahn Date: Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 7:46 AM Subje=t: Fwd: Marital Trusts To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» > > 2 EFTA_R1_01872848 EFTA02640044 Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor chttps://maps.google.comfiq=575+Lexington+Av=nue,+4th+Floor+New+York,+NY+10022&entry=gmail&source=g> New York, NY 10022 <https://maps.google.com/?q=575+Lexington+Avenue,+4t=+Floor+New+York,+NY+10022&entry=gmail&source=g> Phone Fax Cell Begin forw=rded message: From: Max=Kohlenberg < Subject: Marital Trus=s Noam — > > Thank you for your reply. As you indic=te that you are not being represented by counsel I will reply directly to =ou, with a copy to Rich (as you suggest). Please consider: =span>1. =C2 As a starting point, let me note that I think =ou and Rich may have misunderstood (at least initially) the terms of the s=ttlement that Harry proposed through his attorney. Rich and I discussed this in a call about 10 d=ys ago and I'm hoping that misunderstanding has been cleared up, b=t as I'm not a party to your exchanges (and Rich's exchang=s) with Harry's attorney I can't be sure. also not certain whether the terms of the proposed settlement have changed. All I can=say for sure is that characterizing the offer as one in which distribution= to you cannot exceed $100K per year is not consistent with my understandi=g of what has been offered. =u> =span>2. =C2 As you know, Harry's attorney has comm=nced a legal action that is intended to facilitate my resignation and the =ppointment of a successor trustee to take my place. Since you've wanted me removed for some ti=e and since I've said (from the first time you and I met) that I o=Iy wanted to serve as trustee if all the family members wanted me to serve= I'm looking forward to resigning as soon as the court determines how I am to do so and how my successor is to be selected. =span>3. =C2 Given that my replacement is impending, it mig=t be worth waiting until my successor is in place before responding to my =equests for financial disclosure, as it's possible that my successor won't share my views as=to what the trustee of the trusts needs to know before making decisions ab=ut distributions. Likewise, if my 3 EFTA_R1_01872849 EFTA02640045 successor will be identified soon =t might make sense for me to hold off on any distributions and leave it to the new trustee to work with you on figuring all of this o=t. In this regard I'm kind of a "lame duck" =rustee, wouldn't you say? =span>4. =C2 To the extent that you want to push forward wh=le I remain the trustee, let me again state the basis for financial disclo=ure by you. It is that, as trustee, I owe a duty to you and I owe a duty to your children (as the =emainder beneficiaries of the trusts). For the present my primary du=y is to you and it is to distribute to you all income earned by the trusts= net of expenses, and to distribute to you (or pay on your behalf) additional monies as reasonably needed t= the extent that your income from other sources is not sufficient to suppo=t your reasonable expenses. Notwithstanding your statement that "As for the claim about concern for my later years, that has been thoro=ghly refuted" it has not been refuted in the context of my trusteeship and it remains my=duty to consider distributions in light of the possibility that you will h=ve a reasonable need for distributions from the trust for many more years,=and perhaps in increasing amounts, depending on your circumstances in the future. =u> =span>5. =C2 As for the specifics of disclosure, what I nee= to consider is (a) what your income was in 2017, since that was the basis=for the tax payments you seek to have reimbursed, (b) what your income is likely to be this year an= going forward, (c) what your expenses were in 2017 and are likely to be i= 2018, and (d) whether any of your income (or other resources) are being u=ed for purposes that the trust cannot support (such as gifts to third parties). So far, Rich has pr=vided me with some rough information about your 2017 expenses. There=are some gaps in that information, but nothing that can't be clear=d up pretty easily (I think). Rich has also assured me that you have not made any gifts that have diminished your resources an= I assume you would confirm that to me. What I don't have at this point is enough information about your in=ome, so that I can consider what the gap is between your expenses and your=income, which is the gap the trusts might help to close up. With res=ect to your income in 2017, all I can see is that your income tax obligations seem to be much higher than they were pre=iously. I'm assuming that reflects a jump in income from (i)=the profit made on the sale of the condominium, and (ii) large withdrawals=from your IRA. If you want to provide me with more information (bearing in mind what I noted in item #3, above) then inf=rmation about your 2017 income and what your income is likely to be this y=ar is what I most need. =u> I hope this is helpful and will wait to hear=more from you and/or Rich. Max A. Max Kohlenberg Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP<=> One Financial Plaza — Suite 1600<=u> Providence, Rhode Island 02903=/span> Direct: 4 EFTA_R1_01872850 EFTA02640046 Main: Fax: www.hekblaw.com <http://www.hekblaw.com/> =/u> This email and any attachments thereto are i=tended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legal=y privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notifi=d that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any a=tachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this=email in error, please immediately notify me by return email and permanently delete the original and any copy of thi= message or attachment. Thank you. Kahn. From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Friday, July 06, 2018 8:53 PM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: Re: Marital Trust I am not represented=on this issue, so you can send the information to me directly, copying Ric=ard Noam On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 4:24 AM, Max Kohlenberg «= href= wrote: Noam — Thanks for your message and your inquiry. =AO I would like to reply in some detail, but before I do so please tell me whether you are now represented by legal counsel. =f you are then I believe I'm obliged to copy your 5 EFTA_R1_01872851 EFTA02640047 counsel on our e=changes. I would also plan on copying Rich Kahn, since my last commu=ications about distributions to you from the trusts have been with him. Please also bear in mind that since (accordi=g to Rich) you are preparing to bring a legal action against me, I have been in contact with my firm's malpractice insu=ance carrier. As my exchanges with you may also need to be reviewed =ith our carrier that may delay (and/or limit) my responses.<=> Max A. Max Kohlenberg Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP<=span> One Financial Plaza — Suite 1600 Providence, Rhode Island 02903=u> Direct: Main: Fax: www.hekblaw.com <http://www.hekblaw.com/> This email and any attachments thereto are i=tended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. =f you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notifie= that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any at=achments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by =eturn email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this messa=e or attachment. Thank you. 6 EFTA_R1_01872852 EFTA02640048 From: Noam Chomsky I < > J Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 7:53 PM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: Marital Trust Max, I presume it is clear that the recent proposal trans=itted by Harry's lawyer that I should be satisfied with a handout =f 100k a year from the Marital Trust is too disgraceful for comment. I would like to know what further info=mation you require for reimbursement for tax payment. We have previously t=ansmitted a great deal of financial information in order for you to reimbu=se our taxes, including proof of payment and more. Exactly what more do you require, and with what justi=ication? We see little reason that you cannot act on the information=already provided. As for the claim about concern for my later =ears, that has been thoroughly refuted. Noam =C2 please note The information contained in t=is communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, ma= constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of =he addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure=or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohib=ted and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in =rror, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]=m, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, includ=ng all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 7 EFTA_R1_01872853 EFTA02640049 =AO please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="[email protected]" target="_blank">[email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved --0000000000005c165b05706cde95-- conversation-id 79 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1530987772 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 remote-id 834334 8 EFTA_R1_01872854 EFTA02640050