Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02648019DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02648019

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02648019
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Heather Gray < Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 5:14 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Aaah, yes. Christie's draft fine art appraisal has the Picasso bust va=ued at $70 million and their draft appraisal of the Chinese bronzes has th= collection valued around $100 million less than the Gisele Croes valuatio= from a few years ago. In the case of the bronzes, It may be that G=sele has access to the private sale market in a way that Christie's really=doesn't and that private sales are where the higher values are (rather tha= at auction). I don't know enough about the market for Chinese bronzes to know if that is the case, but Gise=e recently sold two bronzes for Leon and her sale prices came in much clos=r to her appraised values for the objects than to Christie's appraised val=es. I haven't asked Christie's why they are so much lower because I wanted Leon to have a chance to look =t the appraisals first (he has both of them, and he also had the books app=aisal where the values for the most part were closer to what we had antici=ated). Sent from my iPhone On May 20, 2017, at 12:46 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@=mail.com» wrote: Leon said Chinese news bronzes and Picasso bust valuation odd On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:55 AM Heather Gray < Sotheby's? » wrote: Sure, Jeffrey. What types of valuation questions do you mean? General =hings like that lawsuit against Congratulations on the =raque, by the way. It did much better than either auction house predicted.=nbsp; wrote: Sent from my iPhone On May 20, 2017, at 8:08 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com> > I would love je to hear about valuation questions please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for EFTA_R1_01886387 EFTA02648019 the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01886388 EFTA02648020

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2648019
Phone2648020

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.