Case File
efta-02668840DOJ Data Set 11OtherEFTA02668840
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02668840
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:37 PM
To:
John P. Woods, AIA
Subject:
Re:
agreed
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:36 PM, John P. Woods, AIA <
> wrote:
I would still try, given the vagueness of t=e height restrictions and him quoting rules and regulations that aren'.
approved. We just have to restate the case.
JPW
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 22, 2016= at 4:12 PM, Erika Kellerhals
wrote:
=> >
John — Cecile, Amy & I had the discussion regarding the fla=pole at a meeting with JP and the Commissioner and
she deferred to him on =he 45' height restriction. I'm not sure that it would make=a difference to go back to her and ask
her to reconsider. </=pan>
<=>
Erika A. Kellerhals
Member
Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC
Royal Palm Professional Building
9053 Estate Thomas, Suite 101
St. Thomas, VI 00802
EFTA_R1_01921102
EFTA02668840
Circular 230: To ensure compli=nce with the requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax
a=vice contained in our communication (including any attachments) was not in=ended or written to be used, and cannot
be used, for the purpose of (i) av=iding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to anot=er party
any transaction or matter addressed herein.
410=A0
From: "John P. Woods" <
>>>
=ate: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 4:09 PM
To: "re=fre E.'" <[email protected] <mailto:'eevacation@ mail.com», Erika Kellerhals
&g=;, 'Cecile de Jongh' «mailto
= target=>
I was going to say you didn=E244t call the Governor to set up the meeting. He followed the issue i= the media
and reached out to you. That's how I understood it when=we spoke on the island, but I wasn't a 100% sure. If that is the
c=se, it might beneficial if the Governor states that at the beginning of th= meeting so these guys don't think you are
running to him every ti=e you have a problem with them. Additionally, I think we maneuvered them i=to stating we
could ask the Commissioner to reconsider the 45 feet height =estriction on the flagpole, particularly since the permit
hasn't b=en fully executed as yet. It is clear to me the section referenced to limi= the height appears to refer to
attachments on a building than a freestand=ng pole. Hopefully the Commissioner can prevail with that. If not, go to L=nd
Use & Appeals.
=u>
JPW
=u>
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, No=ember 22, 2016 1:13 PM
To: Erika Kellerhals; Cecile de Jongh; Jo=n P. Woods, AIA
Subject:
good wor= thanks .. it would have been nice if he began agan the meetin= telling you guys that the governor
wanted a meeting
<=u>
please =ote
The information contained=in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privilege=, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the us= of the addressee. It is the property of
2
EFTA_R1_01921103
EFTA02668841
JEE
Unauthorized use, discl=sure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly p=ohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communicatio= in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail t=jeevacation@gm=il.com <mailto:[email protected]> , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
i=cluding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
<=div>
please note
Th= information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be at=orney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is inte=ded only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
=nauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any par= thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have receiv=d this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
retur= e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and
destroy this communication and a=I copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights rese=ved
3
EFTA_R1_01921104
EFTA02668842
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02486945
1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA Document EFTA01681865
0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01681865
52p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown
EFTA02668248
4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01308033
23p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
839p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.