Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02722033DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02722033

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02722033
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: [email protected][[email protected]]; J [email protected]] From: GMAX Sent: Wed 6/8/2011 1:52:50 PM Subject: Re: Vanity Fair On 6/8/11 9:49 AM, "J Jep" <[email protected]> wrote: > I would say a paid for story thar was nothing mote than a malicious > fabrication -DO YOU MEAN INSTEAD OF ALL OF THIS JUST SAY THAT IT WAS A > FABRICATION..WHAT ABOUT SAYING THAT I MET HER WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND LIVING WITH > HER FIANCE AND AVOID ALL THE OTHER STUFF > • Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:42 PM, GMAX >> MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE COMMENT >> Forwarded >> From: Ross Gow > » Date: Tue 7 Jun 2011 13:49:02 -0400 » To: G G » Cc: Brian Basham » Subject: Vanity Fair >> » Dear Ghislaine >> Klein's questions follow, below. If we are to respond, I would advise >> we stick to written responses rather than engage via 'phone. Klein has >> form for story-twisting re Hillary Clinton. Written responses at least >> give us an audit trail of what was said. >> » A lot of this is Mail on Sunday rehash. Klein has our statement, but >> is offering the chance for further clarification...I get the feeling >> he's likely to make unflattering assumptions if we don't give him on » the record answers. >> » Please advise on those questions which you feel you more comfortable » answering. We can head him off at the pass on those and put legal >> frighteners on him elsewhere. >> » Just a caveat - we should be aware that there is a chance that >> anything other than fully robust answers might be construed as >> inadvertent admissions of wrongdoing, so we will need legal team to >> advise on precise wording. Do you want me to pass this on to >> Devonshires if you have not already done so...? » best » Ross >> » Dear Ross, >> Here are some fact-checking questions for Ghislaine Maxwell to comment » on and answer: >> » 1. Do Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell share a home in London or wrote: EFTA_R1_02206630 EFTA02722033 » anywhere else? Do they still see each other? Does Epstein help support Ghislaine? Her friends tell me that Ghislaine once loved Epstein. Does >> she still love him? » MS MAXWELL DOES NO SHARE ANY HOMES WITH MR EPSTEIN. MR EPSTEIN DOES NOT >> SUPPORT MS MAXWELL IN ANYWAY. MS MAXWELL HAD INFACT BEEN IN COMMITTED » RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR THE PAST 7 YEARS > > >> 2. The Mail on Sunday published a photograph showing the Duke of York >> with his arm around . Standing off to one side in the >> photo was Ghislaine Maxwell. The newspaper said that this photo taken » in Ghislaine's London home. Was it? Did Jeffrey Epstein take the » photo? If not, who did? >> MS MAXWELL HAS NO RECOLECTION OF THE PHOTO BEING EVEN TAKEN GIVEN WE ARE » TALKING AN EVENT THAT ALLEDGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IT WOULD BE >> SURPRISING >> » 3. According to Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her as >> Epstein's 'sex slave' when she was 15 years old and arranged for her >> to see Andrew three times at Jeffrey Epstein's homes in London and New >> York and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James where, said, she'd been 'sexually exploited by Epstein's adult male » peers, including royalty.' Would Ghislaine please comment on this » assertion by >> >> MS MAXWELL MET MS WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND WAS HIRED AS A MASSUSE. MS WAS LIVING AT THE TIME WITH HER FIANCE. MS HAS A PRIOR SEXUAL » HASSARASSMENT SUIT AGAINST OTHER INDIVIDUALS THAT WAS THROWN OUT FOR LACK OF >> HER CREDABILITY AND DRUG USE. MS FINALLY FLED THE US TO AVOID ARREST » FOR THEFT. I THINK GIVEN THIS AND OTHER HIGHLY INDICATIVE EVENTS IN HER LIFE » IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE ONE WORD OUT OF HER MOUTH. FURTHER THE INCENTIVE >> OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY PAID BY A NEWSPAPER NO DOUBT ADDED TO HER » COLOURFUL MEMORIES' WHICH IN FACT ARE NOTHING BUT MADE UP STORIES. >> >> 4. The Mail on Sunday and other newspapers ran the story about » Andrew's rendezvous with in Ghislaine Maxwell's » London home. These reports said that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine » Maxwell left the Duke of York and alone for several » hours, and that the next morning Ghislaine Maxwell told that the Duke had a good time. Would Ghislaine please comment » on this story. What did the Duke tell Ghislaine about his rendezvous » with » 5. The Mail on Sunday said it had evidence to support story flight logs from Jeffrey Epstein's Boeing 727 and » Gulfstream jet. Was Ghislaine Maxwell on these airplanes and who else » was onboard? » AGAIN TO REMEMBER ANY SPECIFIC FLIGHT AND WHO WAS ON BOARD A PLANE FOR EVENTS » THAT ALEDEGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IS SIMPLY UNREALISITC >> >> 6. According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee » at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach estate, Prince Andrew attended naked >> pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent » girls. >> MS MAXWELL CANNOT COMMENT ON WHAT MR ALESSI ALLEDEGDLY SAW OR DID NOT SEE BUT » MS MAXWELL NEVER SAW THE DUKE IN ANY STATE OF UNDRESS AND HE WAS INDEED EFTA_R1_02206631 EFTA02722034 >> ALWAYS PROPERLY ATTIRED. » » That's it for now. >> >> I hope that you can arrange for me to speak directly to Ghislaine. >> » All the best, >> >> Ed >> Edward Klein » 1085 Park Avenue » 5A » New York, NY 10128 » Tel. 212.831.5110 » >> >> » » » » Ross Gow » Managing Partner >> ACUITY Reputation » 23 Berkeley Square >> London W1J 6HE >> » » » » » » End of Forwarded Message > EFTA_R1_02206632 EFTA02722035

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01317277

10p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for th...

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, a contact book belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. The letter discusses the applicable law and provides details on Alessi's testimony, which identifies the contact book and corroborates its relevance to the case.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED /

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED / FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) MATERIAL BSF RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY SUBPOENA v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), S.D.N.Y. In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Sealed Order, 19 Misc. 149 (Apr. 9, 2019) PLEADINGS AND ORDERS 2016-2018 Pleadings (Related Sealed) 2015-2018 Orders (Related Sealed) DISCOVERY Rule 26 Disclosures (All) Discovery Requests and Responses (served) PRODUCTIONS Plaintiff's Production 000001 009349 Defendant's Productions MAXWELL 00001 01364 Non-Party Productions CASSELL 000001 014402 MAR-A-LAGO 0001 0607 000001 000558 000001 000009 VICTIMS_REFUSE_SILENCE 0001 0091 Deposition Transcripts (ALL) April 22, 2016 De osition of Ghislaine Maxwell May 3, 2016 Deposition of May 18, 2016 Deposition of May 20, 2016 Deposition of Sky Roberts May 24, 2016 Deposition of Lynn Trude Miller May 26, 2016 Deposition of Dr. Steven Olson June 1, 2016 Deposition Transcript of Juan Alessi June 3, 2016 Deposition of David Rodgers

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70 EXHIBIT A PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS EFTA00208682 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 2 of 70 PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS Key to Objections (linking to Victims' Motion to Compel Production of Docments that Are Not Prig ileged Objection General Objections -- Inadequate Privilege Log Failure to Prove Factual Underpinnings of Privilege Claim Waiver of Confidentiality Government's Fiduciary Duty to Crime Victims Bars Privilege Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not Covered Factual Materials Not Covered Documents Not Prepared in Anticipation of CVRA Litigation Attorney Client Objections - Ordinary Governmental Communications Not Covered Attorney-Client Relationship Not Established Deliberative Process Objections - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Final Decision Exempted from Privilege Qualified Privilege Ove

70p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02729648

53p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.